Breaking News
Irony, Pain, and Hope of Earth Day 2024
Americans Betrayed: Congress Clears Path To WWIII With Massive Aid Package...
Giants and Pre-Flood Technology With Explorer Timothy Alberino | GFKL #6
NYC High School Soccer Game Cancelled After Migrants Refuse To Leave The Field
Top Tech News
Blazing bits transmitted 4.5 million times faster than broadband
Rewiring
Scientists Close To Controlling All Genetic Material On Earth
Doodle to reality: World's 1st nuclear fusion-powered electric propulsion drive
Phase-change concrete melts snow and ice without salt or shovels
You Won't Want To Miss THIS During The Total Solar Eclipse (3D Eclipse Timeline And Viewing Tips
China Room Temperature Superconductor Researcher Had Experiments to Refute Critics
5 video games we wanna smell, now that it's kinda possible with GameScent
Unpowered cargo gliders on tow ropes promise 65% cheaper air freight
Wyoming A Finalist For Factory To Build Portable Micro-Nuclear Plants
NYT Admits That Its "Mountain of Evidence" For Russian Collusion Is Smaller Than A Molehil
The New York Times spends 10,000 words in some 199 paragraphs on the alleged 'Russian influence' in the U.S. election.
The Plot to Subvert an Election - Unraveling the Russia Story So Far
For two years, Americans have tried to absorb the details of the 2016 attack —hacked emails, social media fraud, suspected spies — and President Trump's claims that it's all a hoax. The Times explores what we know and what it means.
The long piece is a repetition of unproven intelligence claims, spin around a few facts and lots of innuendo. Few readers will ever digest it in full.
That is why this sentence appears near the top in paragraph 5 of a total of 199 paragraphs:
President Trump's Twitter outbursts that it is all a "hoax" and a "witch hunt," in the face of a mountain of evidence to the contrary, have taken a toll on public comprehension.
One-hundred-and-seventy-eight paragraphs later, near the end of the piece, we read the opposite and learn that Trump is indeed right: