>
Does "America First" Mean Bombing Venezuela First? How Neocons are Duping Gullible America
The NY Times Acknowledges That Autism Is Not Primarily Genetic
House Republicans Officially Confirm "Operation Choke Point 2.0" Targeted Bitcoin...
#598: Living In A Post-Truth World
Build a Greenhouse HEATER that Lasts 10-15 DAYS!
Look at the genius idea he came up with using this tank that nobody wanted
Latest Comet 3I Atlas Anomolies Like the Impossible 600,000 Mile Long Sunward Tail
Tesla Just Opened Its Biggest Supercharger Station Ever--And It's Powered By Solar And Batteries
Your body already knows how to regrow limbs. We just haven't figured out how to turn it on yet.
We've wiretapped the gut-brain hotline to decode signals driving disease
3D-printable concrete alternative hardens in three days, not four weeks
Could satellite-beaming planes and airships make SpaceX's Starlink obsolete?

For the last several decades, the official autism narrative was that 'autism is genetic, a GIFT, and anyone who says otherwise is a NUTTER who must be banned from polite society.' The mainstream media pounded this message into the public consciousness every chance they got, and this narrative was enforced through censorship and blacklisting of anyone who proposed other theories of the case.
Then this past weekend, a curious thing happened. On Saturday (October 18, 2025), the New York Times published "A Furious Debate Over Autism's Causes Leaves Parents Grasping for Answers."
The story follows two families dealing with autism, interspersed with quotes from various mainstream autism "experts." It conforms to the standard paint-by-numbers script — 'autism a mystery; it couldn't possibly be caused by vaccines, Tylenol, or food dyes; Robert Kennedy Jr. is terrible;' etc. And then, out of nowhere, the NY Times reporters (Gina Kolata and Azeen Ghorayshi) demolished the official genetic narrative: