1000s Evacuated As Massive Wall Of Water Surges Through Ukraine After Major Dam 'Blown Up'
Journalists Are Asking Ukrainian Soldiers To Hide Their Nazi Patches, NYT Admits
Comey: Imagine A "Retribution Presidency" Where The President Ordered The...
El Salvador Unleashes "Volcano Energy" With 241 Megawatt Planned Bitcoin Mining Operation
Newly Developed Humanoid Robot Warns About AI Creating "Oppressive Society"
Scientists develop mega-thin solar cells that could be shockingly easy to produce:
High-tech pen paints healing gel right into wounds
EG4 18K after 1 Megawatt Hour! Is it worth the $$$?
Terminator-style Synthetic Covering for Robots Mimics Human Skin and Heals Itself
The Death of 2FA (2 Factor Authentication)? + Q&A
High-speed orbital data link drags space communications out of the '60s
WORLD'S FIRST 3D PRINTED CLAY HOUSES
Smaller, cheaper, safer: The next generation of nuclear power, explained
After the US retaliation, another strike by "pro-Iran" forces hit a number of US sites in Syria. It may be just a matter of time before there are more strikes against the 900 US troops based in Syria against Syria's wishes. One US contractor was killed last time. Next time it could be many more Americans.
What's behind the sudden escalation? Fundamental changes in the Middle East over the past month have highlighted how indefensible is the continued US occupation of Syria and Iraq.
Take, for example, the recent historic mending of relations between former arch-enemies Saudi Arabia and Iran which was brokered by Washington's own arch-enemy, China. US policy in the Middle East has long been "divide and conquer," dating back at least to the Iran/Iraq war in the 1980s. US switching sides in that war guaranteed that the maximum amount of blood was spilled and that the simmering hatreds would continue to prevent any kind of lasting peace.
Then the US invaded Iraq twenty years ago and turned Iraq into an Iranian ally. That's neocon foreign policy for you: a 100 percent failure rate.