>
BREAKING: ACTIVE SHOOTER at Brown University - Two People Dead - 8 Critically Injured
Argentina Moves to Let Banks Offer Bitcoin and Crypto Services
We're One Storm Away From Disaster
Think a Dairy Cow Will Tie You Down? Here's the Truth.
This tiny dev board is packed with features for ambitious makers
Scientists Discover Gel to Regrow Tooth Enamel
Vitamin C and Dandelion Root Killing Cancer Cells -- as Former CDC Director Calls for COVID-19...
Galactic Brain: US firm plans space-based data centers, power grid to challenge China
A microbial cleanup for glyphosate just earned a patent. Here's why that matters
Japan Breaks Internet Speed Record with 5 Million Times Faster Data Transfer
Advanced Propulsion Resources Part 1 of 2
PulsarFusion a forward-thinking UK aerospace company, is pushing the boundaries of space travel...
Dinky little laser box throws big-screen entertainment from inches away
'World's first' sodium-ion flashlight shines bright even at -40 ºF

"These events of 2023 constitute flagrant breaches of the Founding Agreement, which Defendants have essentially turned on its head. To this day, OpenAI, Inc.'s website continues to profess that its charter is to ensure that AGI [artificial general intelligence technology] "benefits all of humanity,"" the lawsuit reads.
It continues: "In reality, however, OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new Board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity."
Besides breach of contract, Musk argues that OpenAI also violates fiduciary duty and unfair business practices and asks the startup to revert to an open source model to better humanity. The billionaire requests an injunction to prevent OpenAI, Altman, and or president Gregory Brockman – as well as Microsoft – from profiting off the startup's AI products.
Musk alleges that Altman, Brockman, and Microsoft conspired together to remove the startup's board members, who were tasked with upholding its foundational mission.
"Mr. Altman hand-picked a new Board that lacks similar technical expertise or any substantial background in AI governance, which the previous board had by design," the lawsuit said, adding, "The new Board consisted of members with more experience in profit-centric enterprises or politics than in AI ethics and governance. They were also reportedly 'big fans of Altman.'"