>
Google Leaks: Censorship Exposed
Great Food Reset - Meat rationing has arrived!
Are The "Barbarians" Already Here?
Insulin-free life for diabetics closer after successful cell pouch trial
[Tesla] AI Revolution: Robot Workers, Supercomputer Demands, & Mind-Blowing Designs!
Aviation Week Believes Secret SR-72 Plane is in Production at Lockheed Martin
"Suspended animation" drug could buy time in medical emergencies
Simple technique removes over 98% of nanoplastic particles from water
We are Being Tracked on the Internet Via Our Phone Number! Zero Anonymity
What Can Solve the Huge Energy Demands of a Future with Abundant AI?
Mosquitoes can fly but they can't hide from the Bzigo Iris
Nuclear waste powered battery produces thousands of years of clean energy
The idea certainly isn't a new one – payload-carrying gliders were towed toward combat zones in World War 2, full of troops and/or equipment, then released to attempt unpowered landings in the thick of things – with widely variable results, particularly where stone-walled farms were a factor.
More recently, the US Air Mobility Command tried flying one C-17 Globemaster III some 3-6,000 ft (900-1800m) back from another, "surfing" the vortices left in the lead plane's wake – much like ducks flying in formation – and found there were double-digit fuel savings to be gained.
But Texas startup Aerolane says the savings will be much more substantial with purpose-built autonomous cargo gliders connected to the lead plane with a simple tow rope. With no propulsion systems, you save all the weight of engines, motors, fuel or batteries. There'll be no cabin for a pilot, just space for cargo and the autonomous flight control systems that'll run them.
These "Aerocarts" will be pulled down the runway by the lead plane just like a recreational glider. They'll lift off more or less together with the lead plane, then stay on the rope throughout the cruise phase of flight, autonomously surfing the lead plane's wake for minimal drag and optimal lift. And they'll either land right behind the lead plane, rope still attached, or eventually possibly be released at an ideal spot so they can make their own descent, potentially landing at an entirely different airstrip than the lead plane.
The latter would require some regulatory wrangling, but otherwise, according to Bloomberg, Aerolane believes it shouldn't be treated much differently by the FAA than regular ol' recreational gliders. It remains to be seen how the FAA will feel about this.