>
The Japanese Yen is at its lowest level since 1986 against the US Dollar, losing 54% of its value...
TINA PETERS: "JUST SAY YOU LIED." SHE REFUSED.
JUST IN: Wells Fargo, the $2.5 TRILLION Wall Street giant, just revealed...
Turkey's Erdo?an gives NATO leaders a handgun conundrum after summit
Modular Reactors To Solve Data Center Hysteria?
DeepSeek Developing In-House AI Chip In Bid To Cut Nvidia Reliance
America just took three brand-new nuclear reactors critical in thirty days, a first for any...
Your brain doesn't peak in your 20s after all: Study reveals your mind is at its sharpest betwee
Compasses, not maps: China is building a different type of AI
Farewell, atom-smashing Large Hadron Collider
It's Not a Conspiracy Anymore: Med Beds Exist and Trump Knows It

It's important to understand that, contrary to Donald Trump's quip to Barak Ravid that Netanyahu has "no f***ing judgment," the Israeli Prime Minister knows exactly what he is doing: With a set of strikes at the Dahiyeh neighborhood in Beirut, he is trying to kill both the pending US-Iran peace deal and the fragile peace between Israel and Lebanon that would come with it.
There is a further strategic dividend. Netanyahu is also seeking to preempt Iran's attempt to establish a new regional deterrence equation – one in which attacks on Beirut, and potentially on Lebanon more broadly, would trigger a direct Iranian response against Israel. By striking now, he is not merely targeting an adversary; he is challenging the emergence of a regional order that would constrain Israel's freedom of military action.
Netanyahu even posted a video on his Twitter bragging about the attack:
????? ??????? ??????? ????? ???? ?? ????? ????? ????????. ????? ?? ????? ??? ????? pic.twitter.com/wVARFCkDQe
— Benjamin Netanyahu - ?????? ?????? (@netanyahu) June 14, 2026
The exchange of fire between Israel and Iran last week was about far more than retaliation. After Israel defied President Trump and struck Beirut's Dahiyeh neighborhood, Iran responded by attacking Israel directly – the first time Tehran had launched strikes on Israel in response to an Israeli attack on Lebanon. Israel defied Trump once more and retaliated against Iran, prompting another Iranian response, after which Israel confined its next strike to southern Lebanon rather than Beirut.
The cycle reflected Iran's attempt to establish a new regional equation: that attacks on Lebanon would no longer be cost-free for Israel, but would carry the risk of direct Iranian retaliation. For the first time in decades, a major regional power was seeking to place hard-power constraints on Israel's freedom of military action beyond its borders.
Having reestablished its own deterrence, Tehran was now attempting to establish extended deterrence to its partners as part of a broader effort to rebuild its forward-defense posture. Israel, unsurprisingly, viewed this as a direct challenge to its long-standing freedom of maneuver and moved quickly to prevent the new doctrine from taking hold.