>
No One Does It Like Johnny Carson | Mark Malkoff #470 | The Way I Heard It
Webb is ready - the open source tool that will decode the Epstein files for EVERYONE
Trump administration ending Minneapolis immigration Operation Metro Surge
TUMBLER RIDGE MASSACRE: The Trans Shooter Media TRIED TO HIDE...
Drone-launching underwater drone hitches a ride on ship and sub hulls
Humanoid Robots Get "Brains" As Dual-Use Fears Mount
SpaceX Authorized to Increase High Speed Internet Download Speeds 5X Through 2026
Space AI is the Key to the Technological Singularity
Velocitor X-1 eVTOL could be beating the traffic in just a year
Starlink smasher? China claims world's best high-powered microwave weapon
Wood scraps turn 'useless' desert sand into concrete
Let's Do a Detailed Review of Zorin -- Is This Good for Ex-Windows Users?
The World's First Sodium-Ion Battery EV Is A Winter Range Monster
China's CATL 5C Battery Breakthrough will Make Most Combustion Engine Vehicles OBSOLETE

The rocket was a Falcon 9, built by SpaceX, Elon Musk's commercial spaceflight company. On its own, the retropropulsion landing is a major technological accomplishment. But it means even more as a step toward reliably getting humans off of Earth—maybe even permanently. "In order for us to really open up access to space," Musk said in a press conference shortly after the landing, "we need to achieve full and rapid reusability."
That's because space is expensive. A single Falcon 9 costs about $60 million. According to Musk, each Falcon 9 could theoretically be reused for 10 to 20 missions. Filling a Falcon 9 with rocket fuel only costs $200,000 to $300,000, so even counting refurbishments between missions, that means a hundredfold drop in marginal cost per launch.