>
This is the future we shall bring into being
Elon Musk's Vision For The Future Looks Like A Movie
Phosphorus Munitions Fired by Israel Burn Groves, Orchards in Southern Lebanon
Iran's IRGC Warns It Will Expand 'Geography of the War' If the US Attacks Again
BEYOND THE MOON: NASA plans a nuclear-powered fleet to push DEEPER into space
Big Oil Backs Mazama's $135 Million Bet On Superhot Geothermal
Quantum compass takes flight on Northrop's Lumberjack drone
Terrifying AI Behavior Even Its Creators Couldn't Explain
WW3 Near-Miss? AI Hallucinated Nuclear Weapons Components Aboard Chinese Vessel Bound For Iran
Stripe Is Building the Toll Road for the Machine Economy
Toyota Dakar hopeful swaps twin-turbo V6 for hydrogen fuel cells
4-min turbo-inflatable cubic camp castle is now available in the USA
Researchers Used Claude To Hack OpenAI Employee Accounts
Chinese Scientists Develop New Oil Refining Method That Cuts Energy Use by 90%

It would be small but farther away (ie around the moon instead of around the earth.)
This is a sad, pathetic and overpriced plan.Bigelow expandable stations would be bigger, better and cheaper - especially if launched on a Spacex Falcon HeavyThe Spacex Heavy should have its first launch later this year. Spacex will be able to make larger farings.
The Spacex Heavy can launch 65 tons into low earth orbit.
The published prices for Falcon Heavy launches have moved some from year to year, with announced prices for the various versions of Falcon Heavy priced at $77–135M in 2013, $85M for up to 6,400 kilograms (14,100 lb) to GTO in 2014, and $90M for up to 8,000 kilograms (18,000 lb) to GTO in 2016 (with no published price for heavier GTO or any LEO payload).