>
Amazon Boeing Plane Bursts Into Flames After it Overshoots Runway at Miami International Airpot
Trump grants clemency to 30 people, White House pardon czar says
Bessent: "CUT THE SNAKE'S HEAD OFF"--But Who is the Real Target?
Special LIVE Saturday Show: Could The Gov Seize XRP After Chilling FDIC Admission? Gas Prices...
Floating data center would provide water and electricity to 32,000 homes
OpenAI Cuts Off Elon's Cursor, Humanity's First Star Probe, and Trump's Nuclear Mars Shi
Eating pollution? Plastic-to-cookie technology raises safety, environmental concerns
Ford's $30,000 Fathom EV Truck Appears More Conventional Than Expected
Berlin-based artist Simon Weckert explored that idea with Digital Camouflage...
Tether expands tokenization business into Saudi Arabia, starting with real estate
Ukraine is facing a new problem in its war with Russia:
It charges more than it discharges while driving

A separate lunar lander is needed because the Orion capsule that would sit on an SLS (Space Launch System) rocket cannot land on the moon. Lockheed wants tens of billions to possibly get the SLS and Orion flying and then tens of billions for $150 billion for the lunar gateway in orbit around the moon and then more billions for lunar lander.
The lander would accommodate a crew of four and 2,000 lbs. of cargo payload on the surface for up to two weeks before returning to the Gateway without refueling on the surface.
It would have dry weight of about 24 tons and a fueled weight of 60+ tons.
The manned Orion capsule is currently tracking to about $20 billion in cost. This Lockheed proposed lunar lander is much bigger than Orion and has new liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen propulsion. It looks to me like it would easily rack up $40 billion in cost based on the Lockheed cost track record.