>
Windows 10 is DEAD in 2025? -- Here's How I Run It SAFELY Forever (No Updates)
GENIUS ACT TRIGGERED: The Biggest BANK RUN in History is COMING – Prepare NOW
European Billionaires Funneled $2 Billion into NGO Network to Fund Anti-Trump Protest Machine
Japan Confirms Over 600,000 Citizens Killed by COVID mRNA 'Vaccines'
HUGE 32kWh LiFePO4 DIY Battery w/ 628Ah Cells! 90 Minute Build
What Has Bitcoin Become 17 Years After Satoshi Nakamoto Published The Whitepaper?
Japan just injected artificial blood into a human. No blood type needed. No refrigeration.
The 6 Best LLM Tools To Run Models Locally
Testing My First Sodium-Ion Solar Battery
A man once paralyzed from the waist down now stands on his own, not with machines or wires,...
Review: Thumb-sized thermal camera turns your phone into a smart tool
Army To Bring Nuclear Microreactors To Its Bases By 2028
Nissan Says It's On Track For Solid-State Batteries That Double EV Range By 2028

The use of Hydroxychloroquine as a possible treatment has become the focus of emotional and political controversy. The best use or non-use should just be a medical and scientific matter based on actual medical and scientific studies and data.
In a large-scale retrospective analysis of 2,541 patients hospitalized between March 10 and May 2, 2020 across the system's six hospitals, the study found 13% of those treated with hydroxychloroquine alone died compared to 26.4% not treated with hydroxychloroquine. None of the patients had documented serious heart abnormalities; however, patients were monitored for a heart condition routinely pointed to as a reason to avoid the drug as a treatment for COVID-19.
The study seems to say that deaths are reduced by half if patients who are given treatment early. But it has to be patients without serious heart problems. They did not completely randomize the patients. It is not for all patients. So need to randomize the subset and control for steroids.