>
Charlie's Killer Was MKUltra'd?
Doctors are finally admitting that biopsies Spread Cancer…
We MUST keep talking about this, demand Voter ID. Joe Rogan and Elon Musk on Fraud
Nick Shirley exposes there are 1,200 medical transport companies in Minnesota.
The First Production All-Solid-State Battery Is Here, And It Promises 5-Minute Charging
See inside the tech-topia cities billionaires are betting big on developing...
Storage doesn't get much cheaper than this
Laser weapons go mobile on US Army small vehicles
EngineAI T800: Born to Disrupt! #EngineAI #robotics #newtechnology #newproduct
This Silicon Anode Breakthrough Could Mark A Turning Point For EV Batteries [Update]
Travel gadget promises to dry and iron your clothes – totally hands-free
Perfect Aircrete, Kitchen Ingredients.
Futuristic pixel-raising display lets you feel what's onscreen
Cutting-Edge Facility Generates Pure Water and Hydrogen Fuel from Seawater for Mere Pennies

The payment agreement dated Nov. 19 comes after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in June 2023 in favor of Lorie Smith, who said Colorado's law requiring her to create websites to celebrate same-sex weddings infringed on her constitutional rights.
Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote for the majority that Colorado tried to compel "an individual to speak in ways that align with its views but defy her conscience about a matter of major significance."
"The First Amendment's protections … belong to all, including to speakers whose motives others may find misinformed or offensive," he wrote.
Smith complained she was being singled out by the Colorado Civil Rights Commission because her religious faith does not support nontraditional marriage. Smith said she won't promote messages that condone violence or encourage sexual immorality, abortion, or same-sex marriage.
Smith took legal action when she discovered she was forbidden under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act to post a statement online explaining what content she was, and was not, willing to create.
After the Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, the case found its way back to the federal district court in Colorado.
On Nov. 19, Smith and the state filed a notice of settlement in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis with the district court.
The notice did not specify how much the state agreed to pay Smith, but the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), which represents Smith, said the amount was more than $1.5 million to cover attorneys' fees.
"The government can't force Americans to say things they don't believe, and Colorado officials have paid and will continue to pay a high price when they violate this foundational freedom," ADF CEO and President Kristen Waggoner said in a statement.