Over ten million dead Social Security recipients have been unearthed. Multiple contracts have been examined, with allegations that the US is funding a DEI grant for $265K for Queens College in New York to research why BIPOC teens" read Japanese comic books.

Not to mention the inexplicable expenditures overseas, including a $3.4M State Dept management consulting contract for "aviation advisors in Kenya". A running account has been provided and to date, DOGE examinations have resulted in a savings of $140 billion.

As fundamentally necessary to the smooth functioning of the state that such a scrutiny of expenditures may be, the fact remains that certain allocations of monies, as yet not unearthed or publicized, go directly to the much vaunted protections of liberties and rights. The executive power vested in the office of President is mandated with protecting these rights and a DOGE examination of certain allocations, which de facto attack these rights, could go a long way towards reasserting a free society.

The Monies Allocated to Compromise the Judiciary

The third branch of government, which is the judiciary, has been utterly compromised by a web of pay off/bribery schemes. This fact has been unearthed by multiple parties, including mortgage broker Renee Wyler and attorney Rick Abrams and reported on widely. https://www.academia.edu/50072845/Why_Legal_Reform_Doesnt_Work_by_Janet_Phelan While this reporter has focused on the use of mortgages to funnel bribes and payoffs to judges, and it should be noted that around ? of sitting judges, both federal and state, are availing themselves of illicit monies through this mortgage funnel, multiple mechanisms exist to pay off complicit judges and were recently summarized by former attorney Ken Ditkowsky here--

"1) Direct payment to the Judge or his/her bagman

Payment to a family member or nominee - this can be direct or via a no work job. Hiring the Judge's wife as an employee is a common tactic. (Note by JCP—or hiring the President's son)

Purchase of goods or services from a facility that would benefit the judge. Mrs. Holtzer was an insurance agent. The target to obtain a favorable judgment merely had to purchase a life insurance policy from Mrs. Holtzer.