>
Iran Announces Fuel Rationing As Brent Sets New War Highs, After Trump Rejects Tehran's Latest O
BREAKING: James Comey Under Arrest – Surrenders to Law Enforcement at Federal Courthouse...
Founding Felons: Jefferson Would Be on a Watch List Today--You Might Be Next
If Science Is a Public Good, Let China Pay for It
Researcher wins 1 bitcoin bounty for 'largest quantum attack' on underlying tech
Interceptor-Drone Arms-Race Emerges
A startup called Inversion has introduced Arc, a space-based vehicle...
Mining companies are using cosmic rays to find critical minerals
They regrew a severed nerve - by shortening a bone.
New Robot Ants Work Like Real Insects To Build And Dismantle On Their Own
Russian scientists 'are developing the world's first drug to delay ageing' months after
Sam Altman's World ID Expands Biometric Identity Checks
China Tests Directed Energy Beam That Recharges Drones Mid-Flight
Jurassic Park might arrive sooner than expected, just with Dinobots.

(NaturalNews) Fluoride, long added to our drinking water to improve oral health, is probably useless and even harmful to public health.
Its effectiveness is based on shaky science from the 1950s, yet big dental associations around the world keep promoting the addition of fluoride to our drinking water.
"The sad story is that very little has been done in recent years to ensure that fluoridation is still needed [or] to ensure that adverse effects do not happen," says Dr. Philippe Grandjean, an environmental health researcher and physician at Harvard University.
A little bit of history
In the early 1930s the link was made between fluoride and both mottling – or tooth staining – and stronger, healthier teeth. By the mid-40s the U.S. Public Health Service was convinced that artificial fluoridation of drinking water to 1.0 ppm would provide better oral health without causing mottling from over-fluoridation.
In 1945, they started to add fluoride to a test environment, and by 1950 declared the test a huge success, reporting a 50 percent reduction in cavities. (This number may be slightly misleading). At the same time, people started to improve their oral health practices, and there was an increase in the use of fluoridated toothpaste, too.
Since then, fluoridation of drinking water has been pushed upon us as necessary to improving oral health. It was recommended that every community without naturally occurring fluoride in their water add it to their water supply.
"They have to justify forcing this on people who don't want it – it's a violation of the principle of informed consent," Paul Connett, a Briton who taught chemistry at St Lawrence University, in New York, for 23 years, and helped set up the Fluoride Action Network in the US, told The Guardian. "You can couple that with the fact that once you put it in the water you can't control the dose or who it goes to. Also, is it effective? At least demonstrate that it's effective and then demonstrate that it's safe."
"Studies describing fluoride as a 'neurotoxicant' should ring alarm bells," he added.