Breaking News
Tell General Mills To Reject GMO Wheat!
Climate Scientists declare the climate "emergency" is over
Trump's Cabinet is Officially Complete - Meet the Team Ready to Make America Great Again
Former Polish Minister: At Least Half of US Aid Was Laundered by Ukrainians...
Top Tech News
Forget Houston. This Space Balloon Will Launch You to the Edge of the Cosmos From a Floating...
SpaceX and NASA show off how Starship will help astronauts land on the moon (images)
How aged cells in one organ can cause a cascade of organ failure
World's most advanced hypergravity facility is now open for business
New Low-Carbon Concrete Outperforms Today's Highway Material While Cutting Costs in Minnesota
Spinning fusion fuel for efficiency and Burn Tritium Ten Times More Efficiently
Rocket plane makes first civil supersonic flight since Concorde
Muscle-powered mechanism desalinates up to 8 liters of seawater per hour
Student-built rocket breaks space altitude record as it hits hypersonic speeds
Researchers discover revolutionary material that could shatter limits of traditional solar panels
Mainstream media finally admits: Adding fluoride to water a 'useless scheme' with no benefit
(NaturalNews) Fluoride, long added to our drinking water to improve oral health, is probably useless and even harmful to public health.
Its effectiveness is based on shaky science from the 1950s, yet big dental associations around the world keep promoting the addition of fluoride to our drinking water.
"The sad story is that very little has been done in recent years to ensure that fluoridation is still needed [or] to ensure that adverse effects do not happen," says Dr. Philippe Grandjean, an environmental health researcher and physician at Harvard University.
A little bit of history
In the early 1930s the link was made between fluoride and both mottling – or tooth staining – and stronger, healthier teeth. By the mid-40s the U.S. Public Health Service was convinced that artificial fluoridation of drinking water to 1.0 ppm would provide better oral health without causing mottling from over-fluoridation.
In 1945, they started to add fluoride to a test environment, and by 1950 declared the test a huge success, reporting a 50 percent reduction in cavities. (This number may be slightly misleading). At the same time, people started to improve their oral health practices, and there was an increase in the use of fluoridated toothpaste, too.
Since then, fluoridation of drinking water has been pushed upon us as necessary to improving oral health. It was recommended that every community without naturally occurring fluoride in their water add it to their water supply.
"They have to justify forcing this on people who don't want it – it's a violation of the principle of informed consent," Paul Connett, a Briton who taught chemistry at St Lawrence University, in New York, for 23 years, and helped set up the Fluoride Action Network in the US, told The Guardian. "You can couple that with the fact that once you put it in the water you can't control the dose or who it goes to. Also, is it effective? At least demonstrate that it's effective and then demonstrate that it's safe."
"Studies describing fluoride as a 'neurotoxicant' should ring alarm bells," he added.