>
Bill Gates: A Huge Catastrophe May Be Needed...
New Congress, Same Debt: Our Next Fiscal Crisis Is Already on the Calendar
Dead Simple Apocalypse Power: Build It in an Hour
ALEX JONES RETURNS TO FORMER INFOWARS STUDIO
Dead Simple Apocalypse Power: Build It in an Hour
Gritt and MasTec partner to bring physical AI to solar construction sites
Baby it's cold INSIDE! Scientists create the coldest temperature ever recorded in the lab...
I am IN LOVE with AIRCRETE! Off-Grid, Earth-Covered Dome
Musk's Starlink Is Building An Orbital Bypass As Undersea Cable Sabotage Threats Mount
A robot just built a structure in space for the first time
The Greatest Theft in Human History
3D-Printed Tungsten Survives 74 Fusion Plasma Discharges, Advancing the Engineering...
Dude turns a $23 used smartphone into the 4G brain of an RC aircraft.

(NaturalNews) Fluoride, long added to our drinking water to improve oral health, is probably useless and even harmful to public health.
Its effectiveness is based on shaky science from the 1950s, yet big dental associations around the world keep promoting the addition of fluoride to our drinking water.
"The sad story is that very little has been done in recent years to ensure that fluoridation is still needed [or] to ensure that adverse effects do not happen," says Dr. Philippe Grandjean, an environmental health researcher and physician at Harvard University.
A little bit of history
In the early 1930s the link was made between fluoride and both mottling – or tooth staining – and stronger, healthier teeth. By the mid-40s the U.S. Public Health Service was convinced that artificial fluoridation of drinking water to 1.0 ppm would provide better oral health without causing mottling from over-fluoridation.
In 1945, they started to add fluoride to a test environment, and by 1950 declared the test a huge success, reporting a 50 percent reduction in cavities. (This number may be slightly misleading). At the same time, people started to improve their oral health practices, and there was an increase in the use of fluoridated toothpaste, too.
Since then, fluoridation of drinking water has been pushed upon us as necessary to improving oral health. It was recommended that every community without naturally occurring fluoride in their water add it to their water supply.
"They have to justify forcing this on people who don't want it – it's a violation of the principle of informed consent," Paul Connett, a Briton who taught chemistry at St Lawrence University, in New York, for 23 years, and helped set up the Fluoride Action Network in the US, told The Guardian. "You can couple that with the fact that once you put it in the water you can't control the dose or who it goes to. Also, is it effective? At least demonstrate that it's effective and then demonstrate that it's safe."
"Studies describing fluoride as a 'neurotoxicant' should ring alarm bells," he added.