>
'UNFAIR': Mamdani's city-run grocer plan SLAPPED with lawsuit
Trump Says If Iran Had a Nuclear Weapon, He Would Have Politely Called the Supreme Leader...
Tucker Carlson: We are on the brink of a world war that ends with the use of nuclear weapons
Who is trying to destroy the United States and the world?
NASA Super Light Solar Sail Project Will Be 12-40 Times Lighter and Faster
Space Telescope Interferometer to Image Exoplanet Continents
Twenty-five years of "temporary": how 9/11 built a surveillance state Americans never vote
I'll Never Buy Another WALMART Battery!
Shoei GT-Air 3 Smart helmet drops with built-in AR for $1,500
Freezable titanium plate keeps your cooler chilled way longer than ice packs
Review: Affordable thermal device is made for discovering life outdoors
AI Whistleblower Tells Tucker How AI Could Kill All Humans by 2040

In 2008, the Government Accountability Office estimated that over 900,000 gallons of fuel went to bases around the world for basic power needs such as lighting and refrigeration. And according to a 2009 Army assessment, one soldier died for every 24 fuel convoys in Afghanistan.
Enter "Project Dilithium" - the Army's latest stab at a portable nuclear reactor, which should fit on a truck and a C-17 aircraft, set up in under 72 hours, and be able to provide up to 10 megawatts of power for three years without refueling. The reactor - weighing in at under 40 tons, must also be able to be disassembled within a week. Oh, and it's got to be meltdown-proof.
"Energy usage during contingency operations will likely increase significantly over the next few decades," reads the proposal request. "The modern operational space has amplified the need for alternative energy sources to enable mobility in forward land based and maritime military operations."