>
2025-09-17 -- Ernest Hancock interviews James Corbett (Corbett Report) MP3&4
Whistleblower EXPOSES How Israel Brainwashes American Christians!
Joe Rogan listens to "How to destroy America"
This "Printed" House Is Stronger Than You Think
Top Developers Increasingly Warn That AI Coding Produces Flaws And Risks
We finally integrated the tiny brains with computers and AI
Stylish Prefab Home Can Be 'Dropped' into Flooded Areas or Anywhere Housing is Needed
Energy Secretary Expects Fusion to Power the World in 8-15 Years
ORNL tackles control challenges of nuclear rocket engines
Tesla Megapack Keynote LIVE - TESLA is Making Transformers !!
Methylene chloride (CH2Cl?) and acetone (C?H?O) create a powerful paint remover...
Engineer Builds His Own X-Ray After Hospital Charges Him $69K
Researchers create 2D nanomaterials with up to nine metals for extreme conditions
"These events of 2023 constitute flagrant breaches of the Founding Agreement, which Defendants have essentially turned on its head. To this day, OpenAI, Inc.'s website continues to profess that its charter is to ensure that AGI [artificial general intelligence technology] "benefits all of humanity,"" the lawsuit reads.
It continues: "In reality, however, OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new Board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity."
Besides breach of contract, Musk argues that OpenAI also violates fiduciary duty and unfair business practices and asks the startup to revert to an open source model to better humanity. The billionaire requests an injunction to prevent OpenAI, Altman, and or president Gregory Brockman – as well as Microsoft – from profiting off the startup's AI products.
Musk alleges that Altman, Brockman, and Microsoft conspired together to remove the startup's board members, who were tasked with upholding its foundational mission.
"Mr. Altman hand-picked a new Board that lacks similar technical expertise or any substantial background in AI governance, which the previous board had by design," the lawsuit said, adding, "The new Board consisted of members with more experience in profit-centric enterprises or politics than in AI ethics and governance. They were also reportedly 'big fans of Altman.'"