>
Epstein Client List BOMBSHELL, Musk's 'America Party' & Tucker's Iran Interview | PB
The Hidden Cost of Union Power: Rich Contracts and Layoffs Down the Road
Do They Deserve It? Mexico Is Collapsing As The US Deports Illegals Back Home
Copper Soars To Record High As Trump Unleashes 50% Tariff
Insulator Becomes Conducting Semiconductor And Could Make Superelastic Silicone Solar Panels
Slate Truck's Under $20,000 Price Tag Just Became A Political Casualty
Wisdom Teeth Contain Unique Stem Cell That Can Form Cartilage, Neurons, and Heart Tissue
Hay fever breakthrough: 'Molecular shield' blocks allergy trigger at the site
AI Getting Better at Medical Diagnosis
Tesla Starting Integration of XAI Grok With Cars in Week or So
Bifacial Solar Panels: Everything You NEED to Know Before You Buy
INVASION of the TOXIC FOOD DYES:
Let's Test a Mr Robot Attack on the New Thunderbird for Mobile
Facial Recognition - Another Expanding Wolf in Sheep's Clothing Technology
"These events of 2023 constitute flagrant breaches of the Founding Agreement, which Defendants have essentially turned on its head. To this day, OpenAI, Inc.'s website continues to profess that its charter is to ensure that AGI [artificial general intelligence technology] "benefits all of humanity,"" the lawsuit reads.
It continues: "In reality, however, OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new Board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity."
Besides breach of contract, Musk argues that OpenAI also violates fiduciary duty and unfair business practices and asks the startup to revert to an open source model to better humanity. The billionaire requests an injunction to prevent OpenAI, Altman, and or president Gregory Brockman – as well as Microsoft – from profiting off the startup's AI products.
Musk alleges that Altman, Brockman, and Microsoft conspired together to remove the startup's board members, who were tasked with upholding its foundational mission.
"Mr. Altman hand-picked a new Board that lacks similar technical expertise or any substantial background in AI governance, which the previous board had by design," the lawsuit said, adding, "The new Board consisted of members with more experience in profit-centric enterprises or politics than in AI ethics and governance. They were also reportedly 'big fans of Altman.'"