>
Pulsar Fusion Ignites Plasma in Nuclear Rocket Test
Details of the NASA Moonbase Plans Include a Fifteen Ton Lunar Rover
Celebrating Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations at 250 Years
The buried 'second Sphinx' tearing researchers apart... as scientists turn on each other...
The Secret Spy Tech Inside Every Credit Card
Red light therapy boosts retinal health in early macular degeneration
Hydrogen-powered business jet edges closer to certification
This House Is 10 Feet Underground and Costs $0 to Cool. Why Is It Banned in 30 States?
Cold Tolerant Lithium Battery?? Without Heaters!? Ecoworthy Cubix 100 Pro!
DLR Tests Hydrogen Fuel for Aviation at -253°C
Watch: China Claims Cyborg Breakthrough To Build An "Army Of Centaurs"
Instant, real-time video AI is now upon us, for better and worse
We Build and Test Microwave Blocking Panels - Invisible to Radar
Man Successfully Designs mRNA Vaccine To Treat His Dog's Cancer

"These events of 2023 constitute flagrant breaches of the Founding Agreement, which Defendants have essentially turned on its head. To this day, OpenAI, Inc.'s website continues to profess that its charter is to ensure that AGI [artificial general intelligence technology] "benefits all of humanity,"" the lawsuit reads.
It continues: "In reality, however, OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft. Under its new Board, it is not just developing but is actually refining an AGI to maximize profits for Microsoft, rather than for the benefit of humanity."
Besides breach of contract, Musk argues that OpenAI also violates fiduciary duty and unfair business practices and asks the startup to revert to an open source model to better humanity. The billionaire requests an injunction to prevent OpenAI, Altman, and or president Gregory Brockman – as well as Microsoft – from profiting off the startup's AI products.
Musk alleges that Altman, Brockman, and Microsoft conspired together to remove the startup's board members, who were tasked with upholding its foundational mission.
"Mr. Altman hand-picked a new Board that lacks similar technical expertise or any substantial background in AI governance, which the previous board had by design," the lawsuit said, adding, "The new Board consisted of members with more experience in profit-centric enterprises or politics than in AI ethics and governance. They were also reportedly 'big fans of Altman.'"