>
Putin Calls Up 160,000 Men to Russian Army in Latest Conscription Drive, at Crucial Moment...
ELECTION FRAUD AGAIN: Liberal Susan Crawford did not win the election last night.
NATO WENT EVIL IN THE EU: Marine Le Pen, the NATO op to get her, the context around it...
The DOGE of War: TOP 10 MEMES – Watch MAGA
Watch the Jetson Personal Air Vehicle take flight, then order your own
Microneedles extract harmful cells, deliver drugs into chronic wounds
SpaceX Gigabay Will Help Increase Starship Production to Goal of 365 Ships Per Year
Nearly 100% of bacterial infections can now be identified in under 3 hours
World's first long-life sodium-ion power bank launched
3D-Printed Gun Components - Part 1, by M.B.
2 MW Nuclear Fusion Propulsion in Orbit Demo of Components in 2027
FCC Allows SpaceX Starlink Direct to Cellphone Power for 4G/5G Speeds
Ironically, two seemingly unrelated articles in today's New York Times reflect much of what is wrong with the United States, at least in an economic sense. One op-ed, titled "The Tragedy of Joe Biden," is by Peter Coy, a regular columnist for the Times. The other one, titled "A Big Idea to Solve America's Immigration Mess" is a Times editorial.
In his article, Coy expresses sympathy for Joe Biden. He says that Biden just didn't get the credit he deserved for what he did in managing the economy. He laments, "He had some remarkable achievements when it comes to the economy, but he couldn't shape the narrative around his own record." Coy writes about Biden's pride in having created more than 16 million new jobs and his success against inflation.
What's wrong with Coy's point? Like so many other people, he doesn't question the notion that in the United States, like in other countries, it's the job of a president to manage the economy. A presidentially managed economy is now just taken as a given. No one questions it. And if a president does a good job at managing an economy, he gets reelected. If he doesn't, the voters reject him. As the adage goes, "It's the economy, stupid."