>
Trump Rebukes Carlson, Kelly, Owens, & Jones Over Iran Comments
Disney Set to Make Significant Layoffs as Fierce Competition Takes a Toll: Report
CIA To Integrate AI 'Co-Workers' To Process Intelligence, Catch Spies
Contempt Of Court: Justice Sotomayor Suggests Justice Kavanaugh Is An Uninformed Elitist
'World's First' Humanoid Robot For Real Household Chores Launched With 16-Hour Battery
XAI Training 10 Trillion Parameter Model – Likely Out in Mid 2026
The $7 Powder That Beats Your $5,000 AC Unit!
Private credit is now a $3 trillion asset class and investors are receiving 45 cents on the dollar
Converting Diesel Vehicles to Run on Waste Vegetable Oil, by Polar Bear
Anthropic says its latest AI model is too powerful for public release and that it broke...
The CIA used a futuristic new tool called "Ghost Murmur" to find and rescue...
This Plant Replaces All Fertilizer FOREVER. Why Did the FDA Ban It?
China Introduces Pistol-Like Coil-Gun Based On Electromagnetic-Launch Systems

NBC News reported Thursday that the federal government is investigating whether the NFL is charging consumers too much, now that games are broadcast across multiple streaming platforms that require paid subscriptions.
The story cited two unnamed sources who are "familiar with the investigation."
The Justice Department's investigation into the NFL is "about affordability for consumers and creating an even playing field for providers," one government official told the outlet.
Regulators, lawmakers, and media outlets have voiced concerns over the past several years about how difficult it has become for consumers to watch their preferred sports games as a result of these new rights deals.
In early March, Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah sent a letter to Acting Assistant Attorney General Omeed A. Assefi and Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson about "a new trend in televised sports that may harm American sports fans."
"To watch every NFL game during this past season, football fans spent almost $1,000 on cable and streaming subscriptions," Lee wrote.
He added, "In practice, this requires subscribing to multiple streaming services and maintaining high-speed internet in addition to a traditional cable or satellite bundle.
The resulting fragmentation has produced consumer confusion and increasing costs for viewers attempting to watch their teams."
The Utah Republican cited the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, which granted limited antitrust immunity to allow professional football teams to "collectively license the 'sponsored telecasts' of their games to national broadcast networks."
However, he said the "modern distribution environment differs substantially from the conditions that precipitated this exemption" and argued that paywalls and streaming services amount to a setup that "may no longer align with the statutory concept of sponsored telecasting or the consumer-access rationale underlying the antitrust exemption."
"Accordingly, I request that your antitrust enforcement agencies examine the Sports Broadcasting Act and its applicability to the current media landscape," Lee concluded.
He also commented after news of the investigation broke.