Overlapping conflicts, tightening energy markets, fraying social contracts, sovereign debt burdens that leave little room for maneuver, and an agricultural sector standing on the edge of a perfect storm. This is not a single emergency to be managed by a single agency. It is a polycrisis, and it is arriving at a moment when the Western world is arguably the least equipped to respond. The institutions that should coordinate the response are hollowed out. The public trust required to ask for shared sacrifice is gone. What remains is a landscape of fractured authority, depleted reserves, and a population that believes the people in charge do not understand the physical world they are supposed to govern.

Even more than the energy crunch reveiving most of the headlines, agriculture and food may end up being the spark that sets the world on fire. Rising fertilizer and energy costs, together with a predicted "Super El Nino" later this year will disrupt harvest cycles across multiple continents. Hunger probably awaits many who have never experienced it before.

This in a situation where the political class has largely burned through whatever credibility it may have (inexplicably) retained. Approval ratings sit near historic lows, and that decay extends across party lines. There is no credible opposition waiting in the wings either. The old political machines have lost their tether to everyday life, operating more as closed ecosystems than as representative bodies. Political parties operate outside or above the communities they are meant to serve, and governance has become an exercise in internal maneuvering rather than problem solving. That vacuum has been filled by a different kind of currency: networking, patronage, and the ability to navigate bureaucratic corridors. Real competence, the kind that builds things, maintains infrastructure, and understands material systems, has been sidelined. The result is a leadership cohort perhaps skilled at managing internal relations and virtual perceptions but wholly incapable in managing physical reality.

This gap between management and materiality runs deep. Many of today's leaders rose through an environment shaped by MBA logic, where success is measured in quarterly reports, slide decks, and optimized spreadsheets. In that world, a problem is solved by allocating a budget, rebranding an initiative, or restructuring an org chart. But lines in an Excel sheet are not reality. Pixels on a screen do not grow wheat, repair a transformer, or refine fertilizer. Increasing a budget for food security does nothing if the agronomists, the transport networks, and the energy to run irrigation systems are no longer there. You cannot manage a physical shortage with a financial instrument. Yet that is precisely the toolkit so many decision makers have been trained to use. The result is a governing class that can talk fluently about strategy while remaining bewildered when a port jams, a harvest fails, or a grid flickers.