>
'UNFAIR': Mamdani's city-run grocer plan SLAPPED with lawsuit
Trump Says If Iran Had a Nuclear Weapon, He Would Have Politely Called the Supreme Leader...
Tucker Carlson: We are on the brink of a world war that ends with the use of nuclear weapons
Who is trying to destroy the United States and the world?
Freezable titanium plate keeps your cooler chilled way longer than ice packs
Review: Affordable thermal device is made for discovering life outdoors
AI Whistleblower Tells Tucker How AI Could Kill All Humans by 2040
You Hate Flock? Well There's More...
Will Spiking Diesel Prices Drive Autonomous Trucking?
Chinese Concept Video Imagines the Future of Warfare
OPTIMUS CONFIRMED: 15,000 Bots This Year -- Tesla to $3,000
What is Going On With Robotaxi and Cybercab? Here Are All the Answers
Floating data center would provide water and electricity to 32,000 homes
OpenAI Cuts Off Elon's Cursor, Humanity's First Star Probe, and Trump's Nuclear Mars Shi

Carlson has come to my conclusion dating back years that the wars the Zionist neoconservatives, who have America at war with Russia in the interest of US hegemony and at war in the Middle East for the Zionist agenda of Greater Israel, have begun a conflict that is emerging as a world war that is the road to Armageddon.
Trump promised to end these wars. Instead, the wars have expanded. Did Trump deceive his supporters, or is the President not the person really in charge?
Often I have explained that the President does not have the power that the public attributes to presidents–or that Trump thought he had–and thus events and policies diverge from the campaign promises. Carlson supports my point when he says that Trump is not in charge.
Who is in charge? Carlson doesn't know, and I don't either. On the surface the neoconservatives seem to be responsible for both wars. It is true that the war being conducted from Washington, using Ukraine as its proxy, is in keeping with the Wolfowitz doctrine that the principle goal of US foreign policy is to prevent the rise of any country that can serve as a constraint on US unilateralism. And it is true that the neoconservatives are tightly allied with Israel and support the Zionist agenda of Israeli expansion known as Greater Israel. A question is whether the neoconservatives are in control or merely serve as the operatives of someone who is, such, as Carlson suggests, the US intelligence services and the military/security complex, the financial health of which is served by war. Is a focus on short-term profits leading to nuclear armageddon?
These are not issues that the US media focuses on or permits to be discussed and debated. Therefore, those who are in charge are under no pressure of discovery. They are protected by an array of false narratives.
Carlson is intelligent, thoughtful, and his agenda is the well-being of America, which requires moral instead of immoral behavior and policies.
Notice that RT refers to Carlson as a "conservative journalist." Why is it "conservative" to stand for America and to ask who is really running the show? Everyone should be asking the questions that Carlson asks.