>
Ukraine is not building one drone interceptor. It's building an air-deffence ecosystem.
Resist The Surveillance State: 100 Ways to Fight Digital ID!
Elon Musk: True - to 'not only have conservatives become vanishingly rare in academia...'
Trump Undecided on Moving Forward $14 Billion Arms Package for Taiwan After Talks With Xi
Sodium Ion Batteries Can Reach 100 Gigawatt Per Hour Per Year Scale in 2027
Juiced Bikes proves capable electric motorcycles don't have to cost a lot
Headlight projectors turn your car into a drive-in theater
US To Develop Small Modular Nuclear Reactors For Commercial Shipping
New York Mandates Kill Switch and Surveillance Software in Your 3D Printer ...
Cameco Sees As Many As 20 AP1000 Nuclear Reactors On The Horizon
His grandparents had heart disease.
At 11, Laurent Simons decided he wanted to fight aging.
Mayo Clinic's AI Can Detect Pancreatic Cancer up to 3 Years Before Diagnosis–When Treatment...
A multi-terrain robot from China is going viral, not because of raw speed or power...

FROM CROSSBOWS TO CRYPTOGRAPHY PDF
From CrossbowsTo Cryptography:
Techno-Thwarting The State
Chuck Hammill
Future ofFreedom Conference, November1987
You know, technology?"and particularly computer technology?"has often gotten a bad rap in Libertarian circles. We tend to think of Or- well's 1984, or Terry Gilliam's Brazil, or the proximity detectors keep- ing East Berlin's slave/citizens on their own side of the border, or the sophisticated bugging devices Nixon used to harass those on his "ene- mieslist." Or, we recognize that for the price of a ticket on the Concorde we can fly at twice the speed of sound, but only if we first walk through a magnetometer run by a government policeman, and permit him to paw through our belongings if it beeps.
But I think that mind-setisa mistake. Before there were cattleprods, governments tortured their prisoners with clubs and rubber hoses. Before there were lasers for eavesdropping, governments used binoculars and lip-readers. Thoughgovernment certainly uses tech-
nology to oppress, the evil lies not in the tools but in the wielder of the tools.
In fact, technology represents one of the most promisingavenues available for re-capturing our freedoms from those who have stolen them. By its very nature, it favors the bright (who can put it to use) over the dull (who cannot). It favors the adaptable (who are quick to see the merit of the new) over the sluggish (who cling to time-tested ways). And what two better words are there to describe government bureaucracy than "dull" and "sluggish"?
One of the clearest, classic triumphs of technology over tyranny I see is the invention of the man-portable crossbow. With it, an untrained peasant could now reliably and lethally engage a target out to fifty me- ters ?" even if that target were a mounted, chain-mailed knight.
Unlike the longbow, which, admittedly was more powerful, and could get off more shots per unit time, the crossbow required no formal training to utilize. Whereas the longbow required elaborate visual, tactile and kinesthetic coordination to achieve any degree of accuracy, the wielder of a crossbow could simply put the weapon to his shoulder, sight along the arrow itself, and be reasonably assured of hitting his target.
(click on link above to read the whole article in PDF format)