>
Donald Trump: No American Ground Troops Going into Iran
Iran launches 10 million rial note, highest-ever denomination, as war deepens economic crisis
I've been testing a new app built with agentic AI...
The Dot-com bubble and the Housing bubble were both preceded by an energy shock
We Build and Test Microwave Blocking Panels - Invisible to Radar
Man Successfully Designs mRNA Vaccine To Treat His Dog's Cancer
Watch: Humanoid robot gets surprisingly good at tennis
Low-cost hypersonic rocket engine takes flight for US Air Force
Your WiFi Can See You. Here's How.
Decentralizing Defense: A $96 Guided Rocket Just Put Precision Warfare into the Hands of the People
Israel's Iron Beam and the laser future of missile defense
Scientists at the Harbin University of Science and Technology have pioneered a sophisticated...
Researchers have developed a breakthrough "molecular jackhammer" technique...
Human trials are underway for a drug that regrows human teeth in just 4 days.

Solar energy is free. Solar panels, on the other hand … seriously, have you looked into buying these things? A rooftop setup capable of producing a daily dose of household energy can cost as much as a new car.
To make panels affordable, many rooftop solar users rely on leases and net metering arrangements that let them sell excess electricity back onto the grid. But not all states—including the so-called Sunshine State—allow leasing. A proposed amendment in Florida would finally allow leasing in the state, but it also contains language that would allow utility companies to charge solar panel consumers extra. If passed in November, the amendment (which is supported by a $12 million PAC funded by four of the state's largest utility companies) would undercut the economic advantage of installing solar panels in the first place. It's a solar skirmish that reflects larger questions about the economics of green energy.
About a third of all solar energy is produced by panels installed on homes or businesses (the rest comes from big, utility-scale installations). Seventy-two percent of those installations are owned by a third party—the solar panel company—either through leases or agreements that let the solar company profit from the energy the rooftop user generates. Florida is one of five states that specifically prohibit this kind of third-party ownership. People with rooftop solar, the state's logic goes, are providing a utility—and all utilities must be able to provide power 24 hours a day. Any utility unable to blast electrons into the grid on demand isn't allowed to lease. But even Florida gets dark sometimes (I know, some Sunshine State, right?).
That 24 hours a day thing might seem like a weird technicality, but it speaks to a real concern for power companies. Utilities don't just generate electricity. They build the infrastructure—power lines, transmission stations, transformers—that brings it to your house. "All users pay a percentage in their bill to cover the cost of those systems, maintaining that system," says Jocelyn Durkay, the energy senior policy specialist for the National Conference of State Legislatures, a nonpartisan policy analysis group based in Denver. "But having a solar rooftop system may result in a customer's bill being virtually zero."