>
Erika Kirk shares update after private in-person meeting with Candace Owens
Candace Owens Reacts to Erika Kirk's Interviews and Comments about Questioning TPUSA
Bank of America just leaked their report to institutional clients.
IDEAL HUB TO KICK OFF THE GRAND PLAN: BIRTH OF "USAMERICAS"
This tiny dev board is packed with features for ambitious makers
Scientists Discover Gel to Regrow Tooth Enamel
Vitamin C and Dandelion Root Killing Cancer Cells -- as Former CDC Director Calls for COVID-19...
Galactic Brain: US firm plans space-based data centers, power grid to challenge China
A microbial cleanup for glyphosate just earned a patent. Here's why that matters
Japan Breaks Internet Speed Record with 5 Million Times Faster Data Transfer
Advanced Propulsion Resources Part 1 of 2
PulsarFusion a forward-thinking UK aerospace company, is pushing the boundaries of space travel...
Dinky little laser box throws big-screen entertainment from inches away
'World's first' sodium-ion flashlight shines bright even at -40 ºF

Essentially, proponents of copyright in literature argue that they see no other way of compensating authors for their work. Indeed, many libertarians believe that intellectual property on the whole is harmful but make an exception for literature. If one can undermine the arguments in favour of copyright, then one casts doubt on the necessity of other forms of intellectual property.
But before we look at how authors can be compensated without copyright laws, let us remind ourselves of how consumers would benefit in such a world. Imagine if copyright laws were abolished or voluntarily relinquished. The ideas contained within literature could be transmitted, articulated, and modified with far greater ease. For example, people could easily obtain copies of works for free, meaning that everyone would pay what they are willing to for such content. As a consequence of this, ideas would be more widely accessible.