Breaking News
The Survival Essentials Everyone Should Have at Home
US Strikes Iran's Qeshm Island: Wall Street Journal
We followed USAID money to Serbia and Poland, and uncovered election interference, a coup, and...
As Trump 'Makes Nice' With Moscow, the CIA Has Other Ideas
Top Tech News
PRP vs Exosomes vs Stem Cells: Which Fits Your Condition?
SHOCKING: The Secret (Frantzve) Family Business
Microreactor Gets DOE Approval for Full Power Testing, Previously Contracts with Army...
Ford Fathom: Everything We Know About The Sub-$30,000 Affordable EV Truck
Love it or loathe it, AI is birthing a golden age of science
SpaceX has no competition -- Saurav Shroff, Starpath
Living computers forge a 'hive mind' and work together to outsmart AI
The Faraday duffle bag: A digital lifeline in a surveillance-saturated world
Delivery Robots Accused Of Scanning Customers' Faces, Sharing Biometric Data
FDA-Approval for Drill-Free Cavity Care May Be Imminent After Great Phase 3 Treatment Trial
If EMdrive is real and scales with Q factor then we get almost Star Trek level Technology
If the NASA emdrive performance of 1.2 millinewtons per kilowatt.
8.3 TeraWatts of power would be needed to provide 10 million newtons of thrust to accelerate a 1000 ton space-craft at 1 gee of acceleration. We have no power source that could generate 8.3 TeraWatts for a 1000 ton spacecraft.
If EMDrive performance increases with the Q-factor as some have theorized, then we could tune the cavity and make it superconducting. If we take the NASA EM-Drives and pump the Q factor to ~30 million, then about 2 GW power is needed for the sustained 1 gee thrust.
Theoretical nuclear fission reactors could power such a spacecraft. Gas-core or magnetic collimator fission-fragment reactor might be work but have been theoretically designed and have very limited experimental development.A fast-spectrum reactor with a thermal output of ~ 6 GW and ~35 % thermal conversion efficiency would be a first pass design to supply the power.