Breaking News
Taiwan fires dozens of U.S.-supplied rockets toward China in historic live-fire exercise
Dirty soda disaster: What's really hiding in that trendy drink
Why the Coming YOUTH REVOLT is the Result of Central Bank Fiat Currency Printing
Americans Suffer While Trump Fights for Israel
Top Tech News
NUCLEAR ENGINE - UNLIMITED LUXURY - 20 YEARS WITHOUT REFUELING
China Unveils Nuclear-Powered Floating Hub For Green Shipping
China Launches World's 1st Commercial Brain Chip, Beating Elon Musk's Neuralink!
Modular next-gen US nuclear reactor goes critical
How EMF's cause disease
This Company Will Add Phone, AirPod, and Smartwatch Trackers to License Plate Readers
Elon Details SpaceX AI Data Center in Space Details and Roadmap
5-in-1 miniature surgical robot is the size of a seed
Every hard drive you own will die.
Flying car industry turns to solid-state batteries for commercial takeoff
If EMdrive is real and scales with Q factor then we get almost Star Trek level Technology
If the NASA emdrive performance of 1.2 millinewtons per kilowatt.
8.3 TeraWatts of power would be needed to provide 10 million newtons of thrust to accelerate a 1000 ton space-craft at 1 gee of acceleration. We have no power source that could generate 8.3 TeraWatts for a 1000 ton spacecraft.
If EMDrive performance increases with the Q-factor as some have theorized, then we could tune the cavity and make it superconducting. If we take the NASA EM-Drives and pump the Q factor to ~30 million, then about 2 GW power is needed for the sustained 1 gee thrust.
Theoretical nuclear fission reactors could power such a spacecraft. Gas-core or magnetic collimator fission-fragment reactor might be work but have been theoretically designed and have very limited experimental development.A fast-spectrum reactor with a thermal output of ~ 6 GW and ~35 % thermal conversion efficiency would be a first pass design to supply the power.