>
BRICS to introduce multipolar carbon markets
SHOCKING new Epstein papers reveal CREEPY pedophile culture w Obama and Trump officials...
SHOCKING new details show that Susie Wiles is ENEMY number one inside the Trump...
Doug Casey on the Rise of Phyles and Like-Minded Communities… and Why You Need to Find One...
Blue Origin New Glenn 2 Next Launch and How Many Launches in 2026 and 2027
China's thorium reactor aims to fuse power and parity
Ancient way to create penicillin, a medicine from ancient era
Goodbye, Cavities? Scientists Just Found a Way to Regrow Tooth Enamel
Scientists Say They've Figured Out How to Transcribe Your Thoughts From an MRI Scan
SanDisk stuffed 1 TB of storage into the smallest Type-C thumb drive ever
Calling Dr. Grok. Can AI Do Better than Your Primary Physician?
HUGE 32kWh LiFePO4 DIY Battery w/ 628Ah Cells! 90 Minute Build
What Has Bitcoin Become 17 Years After Satoshi Nakamoto Published The Whitepaper?

An explosive new study in the PLOS Biology journal confirms three things that independent health researchers have been saying for years:
Sugar-heavy diets are worse for your health than fat-heavy diets.
Researchers have known this fact for decades.
The sugar industry actively covered up the research supporting this fact.
The study—bearing the typically unwieldy title "Sugar industry sponsorship of germ-free rodent studies linking sucrose to hyperlipidemia and cancer: An historical analysis of internal documents"—reads like an unlikely pairing of crime thriller and academic article.
At the heart of this medical thriller lies the mysteriously named "Project 259," a research study which ran from 1967 to 1971 to examine the link between sucrose consumption and coronary heart disease…