>
Three US F-15s Downed Over Kuwait As Iran War Spirals, Reports Of 'Paranoia, Anxiety' At Pen
AI Just Blew A Hole Through The Job Market - Jack Dorsey Pulled The Trigger First
Feeding humans costs too much - When Capital Declares Humanity a Waste Product
Catherine Fitts: Epstein, CIA Black Budget, the Control Grid, and the Banks' Role in War
US particle accelerators turn nuclear waste into electricity, cut radioactive life by 99.7%
Blast Them: A Rutgers Scientist Uses Lasers to Kill Weeds
H100 GPUs that cost $40,000 new are now selling for around $6,000 on eBay, an 85% drop.
We finally know exactly why spider silk is stronger than steel.
She ran out of options at 12. Then her own cells came back to save her.
A cardiovascular revolution is silently unfolding in cardiac intervention labs.
DARPA chooses two to develop insect-size robots for complex jobs like disaster relief...
Multimaterial 3D printer builds fully functional electric motor from scratch in hours
WindRunner: The largest cargo aircraft ever to be built, capable of carrying six Chinooks

Nextbigfuture has been constantly tracking nuclear fusion and advanced nuclear fission every week for the past 13 years.
The popular question is when will we have commercial nuclear fusion that has a significant impact on the energy production of the world?
MIT has spunout a tokomak fusion project into Commonwealth Fusion systems. They want to apply modular designs to high-temperature superconductors. They want to get to stronger magnets that will shrink the size and cost of the potential nuclear fusion reactor. Improved magnets would improve any nuclear fusion design that involves confinement of plasma. There is less science risk to this MIT approach but more technological risk. They are trying to accelerate the commercial use of high-temperature superconducting magnets and trying to contain their costs. Cost for superconducting magnets for past fusion projects have been $20 per watt but other applications have seen costs of $1.4 to $1.8 per watt.