>
How Money Metals Exchange is Challenging the System: A Call for Sound Money and Grassroots Advocacy
Does wireless tech cause cancer or is it just another "coincidence"...
Federal Reserve Refuses to Provide Records of Foreign Gold Holdings
Biden Sending Aid, Guns, and Money Won't Fix Haiti
Scientists Close To Controlling All Genetic Material On Earth
Doodle to reality: World's 1st nuclear fusion-powered electric propulsion drive
Phase-change concrete melts snow and ice without salt or shovels
You Won't Want To Miss THIS During The Total Solar Eclipse (3D Eclipse Timeline And Viewing Tips
China Room Temperature Superconductor Researcher Had Experiments to Refute Critics
5 video games we wanna smell, now that it's kinda possible with GameScent
Unpowered cargo gliders on tow ropes promise 65% cheaper air freight
Wyoming A Finalist For Factory To Build Portable Micro-Nuclear Plants
High-Speed Railway Progresses Towards 200-mph Dallas-Houston Line
27 Ft-tall 3D-printed Structure Built by New Robot | ICON's Multi-Story Robotic Construction Sys
Nextbigfuture has been constantly tracking nuclear fusion and advanced nuclear fission every week for the past 13 years.
The popular question is when will we have commercial nuclear fusion that has a significant impact on the energy production of the world?
MIT has spunout a tokomak fusion project into Commonwealth Fusion systems. They want to apply modular designs to high-temperature superconductors. They want to get to stronger magnets that will shrink the size and cost of the potential nuclear fusion reactor. Improved magnets would improve any nuclear fusion design that involves confinement of plasma. There is less science risk to this MIT approach but more technological risk. They are trying to accelerate the commercial use of high-temperature superconducting magnets and trying to contain their costs. Cost for superconducting magnets for past fusion projects have been $20 per watt but other applications have seen costs of $1.4 to $1.8 per watt.