>
Marjorie Taylor Greene - "MAGA is Dead. Where Do We Go From Here?"
Quantum Events in Neurons May Explain Consciousness
UAE EXIT FROM OPEC: THE BIRTH OF A STABLE PETROCOIN
Robot Dives 1.5 Miles, Maps French Shipwreck With 86,000 Images And Recovers Artifacts
Brain-inspired chip could reduce AI energy use by 70%
"This is the first synthetic species," microbiologist J. Craig Venter told 60 Minutes'
Humanoid robots are hitting the factories at an increasing pace
Microsoft's $400 Billion Mistake Is Now a $200 Phone With Zero Tracking
Turn Sand to Stone With Vinegar. Stronger Than Steel. Hidden Since 1627
This is a bioprinter printing with living human cells in real time
The remarkable initiative is called The Uncensored Library,...
Researcher wins 1 bitcoin bounty for 'largest quantum attack' on underlying tech

In the marketplace of battery development ideas, there are winners and losers. When it comes to the solid-state variety of research, we've seen lots of promising advances and expect some of these will lead to winners. And then there are announcements which make us furrow our brows and wonder if there something we're missing when a report doesn't seem to offer much in the way of technological advancement. This is one of those latter situations.
The headline sounds promising — Jülich researchers developing fast-charging solid-state batteries — but the devil is in the numerical details, even if some interesting points are raised. But maybe we're getting ahead of ourselves. Let's take a look at the "who" and "what."
Researchers from the Jülich Institute for Energy and Climate Research published a paper in the journal Applied Materials and Interfaces which claims a 10-times greater charge rate in a new solid-state cell. Unfortunately, the baseline for the charging rate is low: 10 to 12 hours. This means the big increase in speed only gets the cell to a charging time of an hour. That's a rate of 3 C, something that many, if not most batteries in use today are capable of.