>
War on Words: Both Parties Try to Silence Speech They Don't Like
Low Interest Rates Don't Have the Stimulus the Economy Craves
"What's About To Happen Is Not A Coincidence" | Whitney Webb
Future of Satellite of Direct to Cellphone
3D Printed Aluminum Alloy Sets Strength Record on Path to Lighter Aircraft Systems
Big Brother just got an upgrade.
SEMI-NEWS/SEMI-SATIRE: October 12, 2025 Edition
Stem Cell Breakthrough for People with Parkinson's
Linux Will Work For You. Time to Dump Windows 10. And Don't Bother with Windows 11
XAI Using $18 Billion to Get 300,000 More Nvidia B200 Chips
Immortal Monkeys? Not Quite, But Scientists Just Reversed Aging With 'Super' Stem Cells
ICE To Buy Tool That Tracks Locations Of Hundreds Of Millions Of Phones Every Day
Yixiang 16kWh Battery For $1,920!? New Design!
Find a COMPATIBLE Linux Computer for $200+: Roadmap to Linux. Part 1
In recent tests run by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), experimental atomic clocks have achieved record performance in three metrics, meaning these clocks could help measure the Earth's gravity more precisely or detect elusive dark matter.
The NIST clocks are made up of 1,000 ytterbium atoms, suspended in a grid of laser beams. These lasers "tick" trillions of times per second, which in turn cause the atoms to consistently flicker between two energy levels like a metronome. Measuring these allows atomic clocks to keep time incredibly precisely, in some cases losing only a single second over 300 million years.
But there's always room for improvement, in this case by adding thermal and electric shielding to the devices. By comparing two experimental atomic clocks, NIST scientists have now reported three new records in the devices at once: systematic uncertainty, stability and reproducibility.
Systematic uncertainty refers to how accurately the clock's ticks match the natural vibrations of the atoms inside it. According to the team, the atomic clocks were correct to within 1.4 errors in a quintillion (a 10 followed by 18 zeroes).
Stability is a measure of how much the clock's ticks change over time. In this case, the NIST clocks were stable to within 3.2 parts in 1019 (a 10 with 19 zeroes) over the course of a day.
And, finally, reproducibility is measured by comparing how well two atomic clocks remain in sync. Checking the two clocks 10 times, the team found that the difference in frequency of their ticking was within a quintillionth.