Breaking News
EXCERPTS: Citigroup Inc. received approval to launch a wholly-owned securities business...
The Crown Wants It Kept Secret: AG Asks the Federal Court to Seal Information...
The Supreme Court Just Denied Your Constitutional Rights
The state is trying to crush the Amish with ruinous penalties.
Top Tech News
Modular phone promises total privacy at the flick of a switch
Genetically Engineered War Dogs for 134 Pound Cyborg Dire Wolves Now – Later 600 Pound Wolves
They're Quietly REPLACING Our Food With THIS… And Nobody Is Talking About It!
Chicago Opens First "Teacher-Free" AI School as Global Push Accelerates
Solar Panels Are Doing Something Nobody Expected
DeLorean climbs skyward to race electric flying cars
Atari's 800XL returns with a keyboard, cartridges and BASIC
Bioinspired robot airdrops into remote waters via morphing wing-sail
Anduril interceptor adapts to emerging threats via swappable stages
I Built a Website to Expose Solar and Battery Scams 
Moon Direct SpaceX Falcon Heavy Plan is 6 Years Faster and 50 times Cheaper than NASA
This is all better than nothing, but the NASA approach is a waste of money. However, this is part of promoting the wasteful Lunar Gateway program. Lunar Gateway is going to cost $100+ billion. It is using the International Space Station (ISS) style technology to build a space station orbiting the moon. It is better to waste money on space and get more space capability than it is to waste money on the military.
About 30 space shuttle launches were used to add components and modules to assemble the ISS. The Lunar Gateway looks like it will be built from about ten modules.
We could do a lot better in space and spend less money and get results sooner. We could use a few SpaceX Falcon Heavies and land directly on the moon with about 8 to 11 tons of moon base at a time. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy is flying now.