Breaking News
Tell General Mills To Reject GMO Wheat!
Climate Scientists declare the climate "emergency" is over
Trump's Cabinet is Officially Complete - Meet the Team Ready to Make America Great Again
Former Polish Minister: At Least Half of US Aid Was Laundered by Ukrainians...
Top Tech News
Forget Houston. This Space Balloon Will Launch You to the Edge of the Cosmos From a Floating...
SpaceX and NASA show off how Starship will help astronauts land on the moon (images)
How aged cells in one organ can cause a cascade of organ failure
World's most advanced hypergravity facility is now open for business
New Low-Carbon Concrete Outperforms Today's Highway Material While Cutting Costs in Minnesota
Spinning fusion fuel for efficiency and Burn Tritium Ten Times More Efficiently
Rocket plane makes first civil supersonic flight since Concorde
Muscle-powered mechanism desalinates up to 8 liters of seawater per hour
Student-built rocket breaks space altitude record as it hits hypersonic speeds
Researchers discover revolutionary material that could shatter limits of traditional solar panels
Moon Direct SpaceX Falcon Heavy Plan is 6 Years Faster and 50 times Cheaper than NASA
This is all better than nothing, but the NASA approach is a waste of money. However, this is part of promoting the wasteful Lunar Gateway program. Lunar Gateway is going to cost $100+ billion. It is using the International Space Station (ISS) style technology to build a space station orbiting the moon. It is better to waste money on space and get more space capability than it is to waste money on the military.
About 30 space shuttle launches were used to add components and modules to assemble the ISS. The Lunar Gateway looks like it will be built from about ten modules.
We could do a lot better in space and spend less money and get results sooner. We could use a few SpaceX Falcon Heavies and land directly on the moon with about 8 to 11 tons of moon base at a time. The SpaceX Falcon Heavy is flying now.