>
Gavin Newsom's California "Loses" Over 24 BILLION Dollars for the Homeless
Amash Battling Trump-Endorsed Deep-State Doozie For Michigan Senate Nomination
Why Has the Left Finally Noticed Pedophilia?
Constitutional Sheriffs Event Offers Solutions, Fake Media Loses It
Blazing bits transmitted 4.5 million times faster than broadband
Scientists Close To Controlling All Genetic Material On Earth
Doodle to reality: World's 1st nuclear fusion-powered electric propulsion drive
Phase-change concrete melts snow and ice without salt or shovels
You Won't Want To Miss THIS During The Total Solar Eclipse (3D Eclipse Timeline And Viewing Tips
China Room Temperature Superconductor Researcher Had Experiments to Refute Critics
5 video games we wanna smell, now that it's kinda possible with GameScent
Unpowered cargo gliders on tow ropes promise 65% cheaper air freight
Wyoming A Finalist For Factory To Build Portable Micro-Nuclear Plants
While it takes a hardware engineer to fully understand what's going on in their patent, relevant to the discussion is the following quote:
[…] certain portions of the input message, state data, and input values to multi-stage SHA-256 engines 110, 112, 114 may be fixed to constant data values during SHA-256 hashes or during certain rounds of computation in the SHA-256 hash. Rather than providing these constants using registers, embodiments of the present disclosure hardwire these constant data values to the circuits performing SHA-256 hash, thus reducing the energy consumption compared to providing these constants using registers that may be enabled by clock signals.
Intel researchers seem to have determined that there are no optimizations that can be made at "stage 0" of SHA-256 calculations, but that the other two stages, as they call them, have ample opportunity to be optimized.