>
The Gold And Silver Boom Is Ominous
"Coup d'Flat": Billionaire-Funded 'No Kings' Color-Revolution Turns Into White
Will Regional Banks Trigger a "Credit Event" For the Financial System?
3D Printed Aluminum Alloy Sets Strength Record on Path to Lighter Aircraft Systems
Big Brother just got an upgrade.
SEMI-NEWS/SEMI-SATIRE: October 12, 2025 Edition
Stem Cell Breakthrough for People with Parkinson's
Linux Will Work For You. Time to Dump Windows 10. And Don't Bother with Windows 11
XAI Using $18 Billion to Get 300,000 More Nvidia B200 Chips
Immortal Monkeys? Not Quite, But Scientists Just Reversed Aging With 'Super' Stem Cells
ICE To Buy Tool That Tracks Locations Of Hundreds Of Millions Of Phones Every Day
Yixiang 16kWh Battery For $1,920!? New Design!
Find a COMPATIBLE Linux Computer for $200+: Roadmap to Linux. Part 1
Last year, he vowed to sign an executive order directing agencies to abandon that practice, if reelected.
How exactly Trump will change policies within agencies is unclear, but experts indicate he has options.
Regardless, revoking birthright citizenship could impact waves of new illegal immigrants and change the incentives for so-called birth tourism, wherein an expectant mother arrives in the United States just before giving birth.
During his first term, Trump attempted to combat the phenomenon through a policy targeting the country's temporary visa program.
However Trump chooses to end birthright citizenship will likely provoke a legal battle of constitutional proportions and with a case that could reach the Supreme Court, as Trump predicted during his first term.
The concept of birthright citizenship stems from the 14th Amendment, which states in part: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
Lora Ries, who serves as director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage Foundation, told The Epoch Times that Trump could start by directing the State Department and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to interpret the 14th Amendment in a particular way.
"I don't believe that a statute is necessary" or that a "constitutional amendment is necessary," said Ries, who also served as the deputy chief of staff for DHS during Trump's first administration.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has introduced legislation that would end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants.
Immigration Reform Law Institute director of litigation Chris Hajec indicated, however, that a Supreme Court decision will be necessary to effect long-term change.
"A law from Congress wouldn't be enough," he told The Epoch Times, noting that Trump's executive policies and any act of Congress would likely end in the courts.
It's unclear how many individuals will seek validation of birthright citizenship in the future but the Pew Research Center estimated in 2016 that around 4 million children in the United States had illegal immigrant parents.
The Federation for American Immigration Reform, which seeks to "reduce the negative impact of uncontrolled immigration," said last year that taxpayers annually spend "approximately $182 billion to cover the costs incurred from the presence of more than 15.5 million illegal aliens and about 5.4 million citizen children of illegal aliens."