>
The Birth Of Christ And America
Elon Musk Predicts The Rise Of The Machines By 2030
7 Electric Aircraft That Will Shape the Future of Flying
Virginia's fusion power plant: A step toward infinite energy
Help us take the next step: Invest in Our Vision for a Sustainable, Right-to-Repair Future
Watch: Jetson founder tests the air for future eVTOL racing
"I am Exposing the Whole Damn Thing!" (MIND BLOWING!!!!) | Randall Carlson
Researchers reveal how humans could regenerate lost body parts
Antimatter Propulsion Is Still Far Away, But It Could Change Everything
Meet Rudolph Diesel, inventor of the diesel engine
China Looks To Build The Largest Human-Made Object In Space
Ferries, Planes Line up to Purchase 'Solar Diesel' a Cutting-Edge Low-Carbon Fuel...
That's exactly what happened with a case Justice Neil Gorsuch got completely wrong. At the time, it might have seemed like just another ruling, but looking back, it's downright bone chilling. Little did he know that very decision would become a weapon for the left—a legal machine gun used to shoot their warped trans agenda into the hearts and minds of innocent and vulnerable kids.
It's no wonder Justice Gorsuch was dead silent today when a major case landed before the court. The case, US v. Skrmetti, tackles the constitutionality of a state ban on so-called "gender-affirming" care for minors.
But here's the kicker—this high-profile case ties directly back to the infamous 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County. That's the case Gorsuch totally fumbled, even going so far as to author the court's majority opinion. It was that decision that handed the Biden regime the keys to kick open the door for their ghoulish kids' trans agenda.
Maybe, just maybe, as Justice Gorsuch sat there in silence today, he wasn't pondering the case in front of him—while also being haunted by the ripple effects of his 2020 misstep.
Justice Gorsuch remained entirely silent throughout oral arguments at #SCOTUS today in the Court's most high-profile case, U.S. v. Skrmetti. That case concerns the constitutionality of a state ban on so-called gender-affirming care for minors under the age of 18.
My thought?
The justice is reckoning with the ghost of Bostock v. Clayton County (2020) in which he authored the majority opinion for the Court that held under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, employment discrimination prohibitions based on "sex" also included "gender identity."
From that decision, a host of ills was born. The Biden administration has used Bostock to expand gender identitarianism in healthcare, education, housing, & more.
Today, the rent came due.