>
Outrage: High School Hands Out Qurans to Students -- But Bans the Bible...
Indicting Raúl Castro could set up US military action in Cuba
Musk v. Altman week 3: Elon Musk and Sam Altman traded blows over each other's credibility...
Ex-CENTCOM chief headlines lavish Israeli-American Council gala
US To Develop Small Modular Nuclear Reactors For Commercial Shipping
New York Mandates Kill Switch and Surveillance Software in Your 3D Printer ...
Cameco Sees As Many As 20 AP1000 Nuclear Reactors On The Horizon
His grandparents had heart disease.
At 11, Laurent Simons decided he wanted to fight aging.
Mayo Clinic's AI Can Detect Pancreatic Cancer up to 3 Years Before Diagnosis–When Treatment...
A multi-terrain robot from China is going viral, not because of raw speed or power...
The World's Biggest Fusion Reactor Just Hit A Milestone
Wow. Researchers just built an AI that can control your body...
Google Chrome silently installs a 4 GB AI model on your device without consent
The $5 Battery That Never Dies - Edison Buried This 100 Years Ago

The take-them-with-you portable homes, in other words, that people buy because they don't like sleeping on the ground or in a tent or a hotel when they go on vacation.
Increasing, they're being used as homes – by people whose next option is sleeping on the street.
In California, the government that caused this problem in the first place – by making homes unaffordable to buy and to keep (via obnoxious "property taxes," as this form of rent is styled) – is benevolently coming to the rescue by making it legal to live – as Chris Farley used to say – in a van down by the river.
Or curbside.
But only if you're a college kid or faculty member who can't afford another place to stay. Politico reports that "With one in four California community college students experiencing homelessness in the past year, Democrats – who have a supermajority in the statehouse – face increasing pressure to deliver on affordability issues."
Solution? Stop "busting" people for living in their RVs.
State Assemblyman Corey Jackson, who has "a doctorate in social work," says "lawmakers can build long-term solutions while offering an immediate stopgap for a 'worst case scenario' " according to Politico.
The worst case scenario has, of course, already happened. There was time when in America only vagrants slept on the streets because anyone who didn't want to – who was willing to work a 40 hour week – didn't have to. Because they could afford to sleep inside an apartment or a single family home.
It is now the case that tens of thousands – maybe more – are living in the streets of California's major cities because many of them can't afford the rents or the taxes that function as rents. Nationally, the average cost of a new home is about $400,000 now; in many parts of California – especially the parts anywhere near major cities such as LA and San Francisco – it is much higher. How many people under 30 can come up with the 10 percent in cash generally needed to qualify for a 30 year mortgage on a $400,000 home? Ten percent of that is $40,000. In cash. Good luck with that. How many people can come up with the rent, when it's 30 percent higher (about $2,400 per month) than the national average?
On the other hand, $10k or less can buy you a used RV and many people can still afford that.