>
'AI Could Kill Us All': Anthropic Researcher Quits, Blasts Labs For 'Gambling With Our L
Election Bomb in Germany Ends Ukraine War -- Carney's EU Dream Is Dead
Israel Ramps Up Forced Evacuation Orders, Strikes on Buildings Across Gaza
Origins of the War In Ukraine - Part I and II
Chinese Concept Video Imagines the Future of Warfare
OPTIMUS CONFIRMED: 15,000 Bots This Year -- Tesla to $3,000
What is Going On With Robotaxi and Cybercab? Here Are All the Answers
Floating data center would provide water and electricity to 32,000 homes
OpenAI Cuts Off Elon's Cursor, Humanity's First Star Probe, and Trump's Nuclear Mars Shi
Eating pollution? Plastic-to-cookie technology raises safety, environmental concerns
Ford's $30,000 Fathom EV Truck Appears More Conventional Than Expected
Berlin-based artist Simon Weckert explored that idea with Digital Camouflage...
Tether expands tokenization business into Saudi Arabia, starting with real estate

The take-them-with-you portable homes, in other words, that people buy because they don't like sleeping on the ground or in a tent or a hotel when they go on vacation.
Increasing, they're being used as homes – by people whose next option is sleeping on the street.
In California, the government that caused this problem in the first place – by making homes unaffordable to buy and to keep (via obnoxious "property taxes," as this form of rent is styled) – is benevolently coming to the rescue by making it legal to live – as Chris Farley used to say – in a van down by the river.
Or curbside.
But only if you're a college kid or faculty member who can't afford another place to stay. Politico reports that "With one in four California community college students experiencing homelessness in the past year, Democrats – who have a supermajority in the statehouse – face increasing pressure to deliver on affordability issues."
Solution? Stop "busting" people for living in their RVs.
State Assemblyman Corey Jackson, who has "a doctorate in social work," says "lawmakers can build long-term solutions while offering an immediate stopgap for a 'worst case scenario' " according to Politico.
The worst case scenario has, of course, already happened. There was time when in America only vagrants slept on the streets because anyone who didn't want to – who was willing to work a 40 hour week – didn't have to. Because they could afford to sleep inside an apartment or a single family home.
It is now the case that tens of thousands – maybe more – are living in the streets of California's major cities because many of them can't afford the rents or the taxes that function as rents. Nationally, the average cost of a new home is about $400,000 now; in many parts of California – especially the parts anywhere near major cities such as LA and San Francisco – it is much higher. How many people under 30 can come up with the 10 percent in cash generally needed to qualify for a 30 year mortgage on a $400,000 home? Ten percent of that is $40,000. In cash. Good luck with that. How many people can come up with the rent, when it's 30 percent higher (about $2,400 per month) than the national average?
On the other hand, $10k or less can buy you a used RV and many people can still afford that.