>
"American NIGHTMARE!" Ron Paul + O'Leary vs de Blasio | Mamdani + Trump's Big Beau
The story told as only Alex Jones can! P Diddy's Acquittal Of Serious Charges...
IRAN: Everything You Need To Know But Were Too Afraid of the Israel Lobby To Ask
This Is Israel's War - Not Our War
xAI Grok 3.5 Renamed Grok 4 and Has Specialized Coding Model
AI goes full HAL: Blackmail, espionage, and murder to avoid shutdown
BREAKING UPDATE Neuralink and Optimus
1900 Scientists Say 'Climate Change Not Caused By CO2' – The Real Environment Movement...
New molecule could create stamp-sized drives with 100x more storage
DARPA fast tracks flight tests for new military drones
ChatGPT May Be Eroding Critical Thinking Skills, According to a New MIT Study
How China Won the Thorium Nuclear Energy Race
Sunlight-Powered Catalyst Supercharges Green Hydrogen Production by 800%
Authored by Matthew Vadum via The Epoch Times,
The decisions to grant the petitions for certiorari, or review, in two separate cases were published on a list of orders.
No justices dissented.
The court did not explain the decisions.
The first case, Little v. Hecox, is about Idaho's Fairness in Women's Sports Act, "which ensures that women and girls do not have to compete against men and boys no matter how those men and boys identify," according to the petition filed in the case.
The second case, West Virginia v. B.P.J., is about a similar law in West Virginia.
State lawmakers voted to keep the sexes separate in sports because of the "inherent physical differences between biological males and biological females," according to the petition filed in the case.