>
Trump Prepares "Hypersonic Clarity" Declassification Bomb – Could This Be the Massive Take
Live Now, Must-Watch: POTUS Press Conference Addresses Iran War, Ukraine/Russia & Much More!
Department Of War In Talks With Automakers To Build More Weapons
The Most Dangerous Race on Earth Isn't Nuclear - It's Quantum.
This Plasma Stove Cooks Hotter Than The Sun
Energy storage breakthrough traps sunlight in a molecule
Steel rebar may have met its match – in the form of wavy plastic
Video: Semicircular wings give Cyclone VTOL a different kind of lift
After 20 Years, Wave Energy Finally Works
FCC Set To "Supercharge" Starlink Space Internet With "Seven-Fold More Capacity"
'World's First' Humanoid Robot For Real Household Chores Launched With 16-Hour Battery
XAI Training 10 Trillion Parameter Model – Likely Out in Mid 2026

The California Supreme Court decided to disbar former Trump attorney John Eastman over his aiding the president in challenging the 2020 presidential election results.
The court has not yet handed down an opinion to explain the April 15 decision, which affirmed the California Bar court's recommendation for disbarment for alleged attorney ethics violations.
Eastman, a former Chapman University law professor, gained national attention for advising President Donald Trump on constitutional challenges to election procedures in several battleground states after the president alleged widespread election fraud.
The California decision is not the end of the line for Eastman. He can still practice law in the U.S. Supreme Court and possibly in another state.
"Federal courts are supposed to let me keep practicing, and the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed me to continue practicing, even while I've been placed on inactive status [in] California," he said.
Eastman told The Epoch Times the state court's decision is "outrageous" and "Orwellian."
"What's happening here to our institutions that have been captured by hard line, political, weaponized activists needs to be addressed. I was hopeful that the state Supreme Court would do that, but they've obviously punted," he said.
"And so, it's now up to the U.S. Supreme Court to fix this metastasization of the weaponization problem."
Eastman said his attorney will file a certiorari petition, which is a formal request asking the U.S. Supreme Court to review the state court's decision "because of the First Amendment violations that it represents."
The U.S. Supreme Court has made clear that "professional speech does not get lesser First Amendment protection than anybody else's speech," Eastman said.
"And yet, what the court has done here is basically said ... I don't get the same First Amendment protection that the man on the street gets because I was representing a client," he said.
Eastman claims he is a victim of "lawfare" and was "debanked" over the controversy, which he said is "obviously partisan in nature."
George Cardona, the chief trial counsel of the State Bar of California, alleged in a June 14 statement that Eastman violated his fundamental obligation to be truthful and uphold the rule of law "when, at the behest of his client, now-President Donald Trump, he engaged in a calculated campaign to falsely undermine the results of the 2020 presidential election, which then-candidate Donald Trump lost."