>
Joe Rogan Experience #2574 - Francis Foster & Konstantin Kisin
Joe Rogan: "I think something's about to go down."
Whether Bibi Stays or Goes, the 'Special Relationship' Must End
The EU Met Its Waterloo in Warsaw
PRP vs Exosomes vs Stem Cells: Which Fits Your Condition?
SHOCKING: The Secret (Frantzve) Family Business
Microreactor Gets DOE Approval for Full Power Testing, Previously Contracts with Army...
Ford Fathom: Everything We Know About The Sub-$30,000 Affordable EV Truck
Love it or loathe it, AI is birthing a golden age of science
SpaceX has no competition -- Saurav Shroff, Starpath
Living computers forge a 'hive mind' and work together to outsmart AI
The Faraday duffle bag: A digital lifeline in a surveillance-saturated world
Delivery Robots Accused Of Scanning Customers' Faces, Sharing Biometric Data
FDA-Approval for Drill-Free Cavity Care May Be Imminent After Great Phase 3 Treatment Trial

Or perhaps we do. An experiment on mice conducted by a team of researchers from Texas A&M University has revealed a healing sequence in mammalian physiology that rebuilds lost skeletal structure, albeit with less than perfect results.
The discovery may not give us the tools to return whole fingers, arms, or legs to amputees any time in the near future, but it just might give us a better idea of what our bodies are working with when recovering from traumatic injuries.
"People should start thinking about using these signals during the healing process," says senior author Ken Muneoka, a developmental biologist at the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. "Even shifting the response slightly away from scarring could have real benefits."
Destruction of mammalian tissues typically triggers a complex mix of responses from the immune and repair systems. Platelets in the blood form clots, white cells are summoned, dead cells are cleared away, and a cascade of chemical signals sounds the alarm to draw in units known as fibroblasts.
These specialized cells multiply and close up wounds to reduce the risk of infection, threading the site with stiff strings of collagen and fibronectin for extra support.
What the process gains in speed and efficiency, it loses in regenerative flexibility, choosing a path of rapid scar-growth over the creation of a regenerative nub of tissue called a blastema.
"It's as if these cells can move in two different directions," says Muneoka. "They could either make a scar or make a blastema. Our research focused on redirecting the behavior of fibroblasts already present at the injury site."
To determine whether a healing wound could still produce a blastema in mammals, Muneoka and his team artificially applied fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) to the closed stumps of amputated mouse digits.
Sure enough, tissue that resembled a blastema formed. While the cells failed to differentiate into new skin and bone, the change demonstrated that the regenerating process didn't necessarily hit a dead end in mammals.
Next, the researchers added a tiny bead containing bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), forcing the blastema to produce new pieces of bone, ligament, and tendon tissue.