>
Breaking: Joe Kent to Speak at RPI DC Conference!
Painless microneedle tattoos from London startup CipherX
Judge Denies Southern Poverty Law Center's Bid To Dismiss DOJ Indictment
Flock Is Losing Dozens Of Contracts As Citizens Push Back
What could possibly go wrong? Scientists use AI to design new viruses
Dual-motor suitcase drive underpins 3,000-hp hypercar
DoorDash Wins Federal Approval To Fly Its Own Delivery Drones
Shade-Resistant Solar Cells Retain 97% Efficiency After 2,000 Hours of Testing
20 Ancient Engineering SECRETS
Stonehenge Was Reanalyzed by AI -- And the Findings Are Hard to Explain
After Years Of Delays, Aptera Is Finally Preparing To Build Customer Cars
'When you kill it, it doesn't die': the jellyfish that has cracked the secret of immorta
Archer Aviation debuts Halo autonomous VTOL, Thunder's commercial twin
US Telecoms Slide On Starlink Mobile Threat; Bernstein Sees It As A "Jab, But No Knockout Yet**

Or perhaps we do. An experiment on mice conducted by a team of researchers from Texas A&M University has revealed a healing sequence in mammalian physiology that rebuilds lost skeletal structure, albeit with less than perfect results.
The discovery may not give us the tools to return whole fingers, arms, or legs to amputees any time in the near future, but it just might give us a better idea of what our bodies are working with when recovering from traumatic injuries.
"People should start thinking about using these signals during the healing process," says senior author Ken Muneoka, a developmental biologist at the Texas A&M College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. "Even shifting the response slightly away from scarring could have real benefits."
Destruction of mammalian tissues typically triggers a complex mix of responses from the immune and repair systems. Platelets in the blood form clots, white cells are summoned, dead cells are cleared away, and a cascade of chemical signals sounds the alarm to draw in units known as fibroblasts.
These specialized cells multiply and close up wounds to reduce the risk of infection, threading the site with stiff strings of collagen and fibronectin for extra support.
What the process gains in speed and efficiency, it loses in regenerative flexibility, choosing a path of rapid scar-growth over the creation of a regenerative nub of tissue called a blastema.
"It's as if these cells can move in two different directions," says Muneoka. "They could either make a scar or make a blastema. Our research focused on redirecting the behavior of fibroblasts already present at the injury site."
To determine whether a healing wound could still produce a blastema in mammals, Muneoka and his team artificially applied fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) to the closed stumps of amputated mouse digits.
Sure enough, tissue that resembled a blastema formed. While the cells failed to differentiate into new skin and bone, the change demonstrated that the regenerating process didn't necessarily hit a dead end in mammals.
Next, the researchers added a tiny bead containing bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), forcing the blastema to produce new pieces of bone, ligament, and tendon tissue.