He might have spoken of his efforts to create a peaceful off-ramp for Washington's Middle East obsession, including his widely unpopular advocacy for Israel's genocidaires and warmongers.  Instead he introduced another war at home, against the states, and in particular their Constitutional role to manage state elections, and for that matter, to name their substitute Senators and to allocate their presidential electors.

Some viewers may have put off by Trump's direct lies regarding the health of the US economy; others by his pointed disregard for the cost of and damage done by his repeated illegal wars on Iran, extended proxy war in Ukraine, regime changes, and attempted regime changes via electoral manipulation.  The Macro Butler summed it up perfectly, as he always does,

the Manipulator-in-Chief devoted 25 minutes to relitigating the 2020 election, stoking doubts about the upcoming midterms, and presenting declassified intelligence reports so heavily redacted, years old, and evidentially thin that the most damning claim about noncitizen voters arrived as a one-page press release with no underlying evidence.                                                                               

Who gets to vote is a state issue, and a relatively modern one.  If states themselves cannot be accountable to their own populations, for their own benefit, what chance does the whole US population have when the feds run everything and the control grid is mature?  Is Trump proposing a national database of voters, and federal control over state elections for "better representation" for the MAGA crowd?  Or is it for easier manipulation and data control, like the kind the CIA and USAID has done in overseas elections for decades?

Trump seems to think his personal credibility shares the qualities he assumes of his Patriot PAC-3 interceptors, Tomahawks, US manufactured drones, and US soldiers and Marines:  unlimited and invincible.  He seems to be wasting all of these assets in a way that makes a citizen wonder what Trump's clown-like role really is, vis a vis the deep state.

Whether his problem is a lack of information, his inability to logically process the information he is exposed to, or a personality or age-related defect related to his narcissism may be debated.  Most people recognize that US presidents selected or elected since 1963 are truly captured elements of the deep state, a neocolonial entity that requires war and resource confiscation abroad – and at home – to sustain itself. Targets and regions ripe for pillage are increasingly in short supply, running dry, and fighting back.  Individuals, groups, nations, and regions opposed to the "deep state" and its theft, murder, and destruction of markets, see Washington, and her affiliates and associated Ponzi schemers throughout the world, as not only an enemy, but as an existential enemy.  The war against this state is not only a war of tactics and strategies, but a spiritual and moral war.