>
America could descend into chaos in minutes: Ex-FBI agents warn of 'existential threat'...
Ominous new war signal as Trump sends third aircraft carrier toward Iran as he threatens...
UFOs could be hiding in our oceans, says retired US Navy admiral... as researcher claims to have...
Seattle's Socialist Mayor Faces Business Revolt As Utopia Dreams Implode, Nearly Half Weigh Exit
Microreactor Gets DOE Approval for Full Power Testing, Previously Contracts with Army...
Ford Fathom: Everything We Know About The Sub-$30,000 Affordable EV Truck
Love it or loathe it, AI is birthing a golden age of science
SpaceX has no competition -- Saurav Shroff, Starpath
Living computers forge a 'hive mind' and work together to outsmart AI
The Faraday duffle bag: A digital lifeline in a surveillance-saturated world
Delivery Robots Accused Of Scanning Customers' Faces, Sharing Biometric Data
Brace Yourselves: Serious Trouble Brewing In The Data Center Industry
FDA-Approval for Drill-Free Cavity Care May Be Imminent After Great Phase 3 Treatment Trial
California Startup Says It Has Injected AI-Designed Virus Into Humans For First Time

"Can't we just be Mexico or Paraguay and have peace and quiet while things mostly go to hell?"
- Matt Taibbi
The garish stunt pulled by the Democratic Party in Alaska's US Senate race has been known for months - a florid, festering carbuncle on the election's face - and The New York Times finally reported it this week, mainly to get ahead of an accelerating DOJ probe, spin the story, and soften its sharp edges for public consumption. And a day later, the newspaper is now straining to say that it's just normal politics.
Here's what happened: Rep. Mary Peltola is running against sitting US Senator Dan Sullivan (Dan S.). Somehow, a second Dan Sullivan (Dan J.), a retired nobody in a remote fishing village, was induced to jump on the ranked-choice ballot. (The ranked-choice method is another layer of trickery.) So, there are two Dan Sullivans on the ballot.
Do you suppose this might confuse voters and siphon off votes from the real Sullivan to push a Peltola victory?
Peltola fired her campaign manager, Elisa Rios, in August, for reasons not yet disclosed. Rios then filed a wrongful termination lawsuit against Peltola and sometime along in there Rios went to The Times with the story of how two Dan Sullivans ended up on the Alaska ballot. Turns out that the campaign ran a "ballot composition project." Also involved were the national Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) and the Marc Elias law firm, which represents both the DSCC and Rep. Peltola's campaign. Marc Elias was previously the Perkins Coie lawyer who represented the 2016 Hillary Clinton campaign and helped arrange the Steele Dossier facet of the RussiaGate prank. Elias has since then been working tirelessly to engineer election procedures that favor Democrats, enable voting by non-citizens, block election reform, and file lawsuits to prevent states from turning over voter rolls to the DOJ, as they have demanded.
[ZH: Of course, the Peltola campaign has said it "has no involvement with either Sullivan campaign," and Dan J. Sullivan has denied any contact with her team, according to reports on the Times story.]
A pro-Peltola political action committee (49th State PAC) paid $87,000 to an Ohio consulting company run by one Jerid Kurtz (operating under the name "Zane") to compile a list of all the Dan Sullivans in Alaska and recruit one to run for Dan S. Sullivan's Senate seat. They succeeded, finding Dan J., age 69, a retired US Forest Service employee and schoolteacher, in Petersburg, AK, who had never run for anything before. In late May 2026, he filed as a Senate candidate without a party label, then received about 2.5% in the top-four primary, and advanced to the general election ballot.