>
Trump's War In Iran Is Not Destroying Iran; It Is Destroying AMERICA
NASA Chief: "We Just Built Antigravity Propulsion!"
Carl Higbie (NEWSMAX) says LIVE on TV: "The Senate is supposed to vote on the Clarity Act NEXT
Quantum computing may soon become part of the microscope itself.
Quantum computing may soon become part of the microscope itself.
Volkswagen Just Unveiled The Most Efficient EV Ever Tested
NASA Super Light Solar Sail Project Will Be 12-40 Times Lighter and Faster
Space Telescope Interferometer to Image Exoplanet Continents
Twenty-five years of "temporary": how 9/11 built a surveillance state Americans never vote
I'll Never Buy Another WALMART Battery!
Shoei GT-Air 3 Smart helmet drops with built-in AR for $1,500
AI Whistleblower Tells Tucker How AI Could Kill All Humans by 2040

NISQ devices cannot be simulated by brute force using the most powerful currently existing supercomputers.
NISQ will be an interesting tool for exploring physics. It might also have useful applications. But we're not sure about that.
NISQ will not change the world by itself. Rather it is a step toward more powerful quantum technologies of the future.
Potentially transformative scalable quantum computers may still be decades away. We're not sure how long it will take.
Qubit "quality"
The number of qubits is an important metric, but it is not the only thing that matters. The quality of the qubits, and of the "quantum gates" that process the qubits, is also very important. All quantum gates today are noisy, but some are better than
others. Qubit measurements are also noisy.
For today's best hardware (superconducting circuits or trapped ions), the probability of error per (two-qubit) gate is about 1 per 1000, and the probability of error per measurement is about 1 per 100 (or better for trapped ions). We don't yet know whether systems with many qubits will perform that well.