>
Benjamin Netanyahu Holds Middle Finger In The Face Of The U.S. And the Entire World
Doomed Dali ship's audio black box reveals multiple alarms were blaring in moments...
Hair-loss treatment found in cinnamon
Baltimore Bridge Collapse May Cost Billions, Dramatically Disrupt Supply Chains
Scientists Close To Controlling All Genetic Material On Earth
Doodle to reality: World's 1st nuclear fusion-powered electric propulsion drive
Phase-change concrete melts snow and ice without salt or shovels
You Won't Want To Miss THIS During The Total Solar Eclipse (3D Eclipse Timeline And Viewing Tips
China Room Temperature Superconductor Researcher Had Experiments to Refute Critics
5 video games we wanna smell, now that it's kinda possible with GameScent
Unpowered cargo gliders on tow ropes promise 65% cheaper air freight
Wyoming A Finalist For Factory To Build Portable Micro-Nuclear Plants
High-Speed Railway Progresses Towards 200-mph Dallas-Houston Line
27 Ft-tall 3D-printed Structure Built by New Robot | ICON's Multi-Story Robotic Construction Sys
The overhead cost for error correction improves as gate error rate declines.
The Google Quantum supremacy demonstrations confirmed the quantum world has huge computing resources. We are in the noisy qubit era. We can explore heuristic quantum algorithms. We might get near-term quantum advantage for useful applications but this is not guaranteed.
Near-term algorithms should be designed with noise resilience (noisy qubits) in mind.
We will get good truly random number generation and will explore new quantum simulation of complex systems.
Lower quantum gate error rates will lower the overhead cost of quantum error correction, and also extend the reach of quantum algorithms which do not use error correction.
Dequantization: Practical uses of quantum linear algebra and of quantum-inspired classical algorithms are still unclear.