>
How to Create the Most Destructive Financial Bubble in History: Unleash the Finance Quants
US Designates Helium A Critical Material In Reindustrialization Push To Avoid...
Tyler Robinson's Lawyers Seek to Delay Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Until 2029...
President Trump Reacts to Arrest of FBI Officials Involved in Hunter Biden Laptop Investigation...
Genetically Engineered War Dogs for 134 Pound Cyborg Dire Wolves Now – Later 600 Pound Wolves
They're Quietly REPLACING Our Food With THIS… And Nobody Is Talking About It!
Chicago Opens First "Teacher-Free" AI School as Global Push Accelerates
Solar Panels Are Doing Something Nobody Expected
DeLorean climbs skyward to race electric flying cars
Atari's 800XL returns with a keyboard, cartridges and BASIC
Bioinspired robot airdrops into remote waters via morphing wing-sail
Anduril interceptor adapts to emerging threats via swappable stages
I Built a Website to Expose Solar and Battery Scams
Whistleblower Issues Dire Warning: Rogue AI, Hacking Nuclear Programs...

Signs have begun to appear on the horizon that in the future they will attempt to expand their power by increasing their role in social engineering. This is a term that refers to efforts to influence particular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale. Its goal is to produce or change certain desired social characteristics in a population. In the past, this has been more the role of governments with the consent of the people often through laws and tax policies.
In America, the Fed was initially given the mandate to create a stable monetary environment. Since that time it has been expanded into what is now known collectively as the "dual mandate." Now its two goals also include achieving maximum sustainable employment in conjunction with price stability. The Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which sets U.S. monetary policy, has translated these mandates in rather broad terms.
In the last few weeks, Christine Lagarde, the new head of the ECB, said something that shocked many people. She stated,
"We should be happier to have a job than to have our savings protected… I think that it is in this spirit that monetary policy has been decided by my predecessors and I think they made quite a beneficial choice."
If this is true we are in big trouble. It is a sign that something is terribly wrong, the idea that you can have a job but you can't save anything, places workers in a position of servitude where they are dependent on, at the total mercy of the economy and the government.