>
Venezuelan migrant influencer who sparked fury with TikTok squatting tips is a fugitive...
Moderna Vaccine Recipients Have Greater Risk Of Developing Chronic Condition: Study
China's Xi Meets With US CEOs, Including Blackstone's Schwarzman...
Dollar Down 20% Since 2020, Biden Blames Greed
Scientists Close To Controlling All Genetic Material On Earth
Doodle to reality: World's 1st nuclear fusion-powered electric propulsion drive
Phase-change concrete melts snow and ice without salt or shovels
You Won't Want To Miss THIS During The Total Solar Eclipse (3D Eclipse Timeline And Viewing Tips
China Room Temperature Superconductor Researcher Had Experiments to Refute Critics
5 video games we wanna smell, now that it's kinda possible with GameScent
Unpowered cargo gliders on tow ropes promise 65% cheaper air freight
Wyoming A Finalist For Factory To Build Portable Micro-Nuclear Plants
High-Speed Railway Progresses Towards 200-mph Dallas-Houston Line
27 Ft-tall 3D-printed Structure Built by New Robot | ICON's Multi-Story Robotic Construction Sys
Signs have begun to appear on the horizon that in the future they will attempt to expand their power by increasing their role in social engineering. This is a term that refers to efforts to influence particular attitudes and social behaviors on a large scale. Its goal is to produce or change certain desired social characteristics in a population. In the past, this has been more the role of governments with the consent of the people often through laws and tax policies.
In America, the Fed was initially given the mandate to create a stable monetary environment. Since that time it has been expanded into what is now known collectively as the "dual mandate." Now its two goals also include achieving maximum sustainable employment in conjunction with price stability. The Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which sets U.S. monetary policy, has translated these mandates in rather broad terms.
In the last few weeks, Christine Lagarde, the new head of the ECB, said something that shocked many people. She stated,
"We should be happier to have a job than to have our savings protected… I think that it is in this spirit that monetary policy has been decided by my predecessors and I think they made quite a beneficial choice."
If this is true we are in big trouble. It is a sign that something is terribly wrong, the idea that you can have a job but you can't save anything, places workers in a position of servitude where they are dependent on, at the total mercy of the economy and the government.