>
Which party represents Americans?
Even The Best AI Scenario Is The End Of Everything We've Ever Been
In Simulated War Games, Top AI Models Recommended Using Nukes 95% Of The Time
Rising Cancer Rates, the Globalist Agenda, and the Big Business Land Grab Making You Poor
New Spray-on Powder Instantly Seals Life-Threatening Wounds in Battle or During Disasters
AI-enhanced stethoscope excels at listening to our hearts
Flame-treated sunscreen keeps the zinc but cuts the smeary white look
Display hub adds three more screens powered through single USB port
We Finally Know How Fast The Tesla Semi Will Charge: Very, Very Fast
Drone-launching underwater drone hitches a ride on ship and sub hulls
Humanoid Robots Get "Brains" As Dual-Use Fears Mount
SpaceX Authorized to Increase High Speed Internet Download Speeds 5X Through 2026
Space AI is the Key to the Technological Singularity
Velocitor X-1 eVTOL could be beating the traffic in just a year

You get a sense of the people who are involved in laying the foundations of physics. Freeman tells you about the nature of the geniuses involved.
Freeman Dyson was a genius. He tells you about the genius of Enrico Fermi. Fermi's physics intuition and genius saved Freeman Dyson from wasting 5 years working on a physics theory that was wrong. Dyson and a team had already spent many months working on it.
There are interesting insights into high-level math and physics and how to think rigorously at a high level.
Fermi said, When one does a theoretical calculation there are two ways to do it. Either you should have a clear physical model in mind or you should have a rigorous mathematical basis.
Dyson: What do you think of the numerical agreement?
Fermi: How many parameters did you use for the fitting and how many free parameters were there in your method.
Dyson: There are four
Fermi: You know Johnny Von Neumann always used to say with four parameters I could a fit an elephant and with five I could make him wiggle his trunk. I do not find the numerical method very impressive either.