>
O'KEEFE INFILTRATES DAVOS WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM
We're Better Than We Think We Are
Mike Benz reminds MAGA who the REAL enemy is. And it's our fault…
The day of the tactical laser weapon arrives
'ELITE': The Palantir App ICE Uses to Find Neighborhoods to Raid
Solar Just Took a Huge Leap Forward!- CallSun 215 Anti Shade Panel
XAI Grok 4.20 and OpenAI GPT 5.2 Are Solving Significant Previously Unsolved Math Proofs
Watch: World's fastest drone hits 408 mph to reclaim speed record
Ukrainian robot soldier holds off Russian forces by itself in six-week battle
NASA announces strongest evidence yet for ancient life on Mars
Caltech has successfully demonstrated wireless energy transfer...
The TZLA Plasma Files: The Secret Health Sovereignty Tech That Uncle Trump And The CIA Tried To Bury

Joseph Makin at the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues used deep learning algorithms to study the brain signals of four women as they spoke. The women, who all have epilepsy, already had electrodes attached to their brains to monitor seizures.
Each woman was asked to read aloud from a set of sentences as the team measured brain activity. The largest group of sentences contained 250 unique words.
The team fed this brain activity to a neural network algorithm, training it to identify regularly occurring patterns that could be linked to repeated aspects of speech, such as vowels or consonants. These patterns were then fed to a second neural network, which tried to turn them into words to form a sentence.
Each woman repeated the sentences at least twice, and the final repetition didn't form part of the training data, allowing the researchers to test the system.
Each time a person speaks the same sentence, the brain activity associated will be similar but not identical. "Memorising the brain activity of these sentences wouldn't help, so the network instead has to learn what's similar about them so that it can generalise to this final example," says Makin. Across the four women, the AI's best performance was an average translation error rate of 3 per cent.