>
Russia Hits Ukraine Power Plant Despite "Energy Ceasefire"
Multi-material insulation delivers up to 10,000 x the stiffness
Trump Just Started The Debt Spiral
Anduril's plan to save US sub edge from China's undersea surge
Researchers Develop AI 'Mind-Reading' Tool That Reconstructs What Your Eyes See
Video: Dexterous robot hand learns the delicate art of silk embroidery
The computer that can read your mind:
SHOCK CASE REPORT: Advanced Alzheimer's Patient Regains Speech, Memory, Mobility...
Most artificial limbs rely on silicone or plastic to mimic human hands.
Flying cell tower beams phone signal to Japan from 10 miles up
Chinese Commercial Reactor Achieves Nuclear Fusion with Clean Hydrogen-Boron Fuel
Palmer Luckey: Autonomous Weapons Are Ancient and Why Anduril Won't Build Humanoids | EP #295

Combustion engines are tried and true, and however angry they might look and sound in a top-fuel dragster or space rocket booster, the combustion process of oxidizing fuel in air is relatively slow and predictable. Detonation, on the other hand, is as chaotic and destructive as it sounds. It's how most bombs work; you take an explosive fuel and hit it with a jolt of energy, and the chemical bonds holding each molecule together break apart, releasing wild amounts of energy in a shockwave that expands at supersonic speed.
NASA, along with many other groups, wants to harness these explosions for a couple of key reasons. Firstly, detonation engines have a considerably higher theoretical level of efficiency than combustion engines, perhaps as much as 25%; they should be able to produce more thrust using less fuel and a smaller rocket. In the engineering and economics of space flight, that means cheaper launches, more billable payload, and greater distances.