>
Audio + English transcript from the closed-door July 9, 2025 court hearing in the case against...
Trump: Obama started this WHOLE thing! (6 mins on it from the Maria B interview)
Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine
US Politics Is Just Nonstop Fake Revolutions Now
3D Printed Aluminum Alloy Sets Strength Record on Path to Lighter Aircraft Systems
Big Brother just got an upgrade.
SEMI-NEWS/SEMI-SATIRE: October 12, 2025 Edition
Stem Cell Breakthrough for People with Parkinson's
Linux Will Work For You. Time to Dump Windows 10. And Don't Bother with Windows 11
XAI Using $18 Billion to Get 300,000 More Nvidia B200 Chips
Immortal Monkeys? Not Quite, But Scientists Just Reversed Aging With 'Super' Stem Cells
ICE To Buy Tool That Tracks Locations Of Hundreds Of Millions Of Phones Every Day
Yixiang 16kWh Battery For $1,920!? New Design!
Find a COMPATIBLE Linux Computer for $200+: Roadmap to Linux. Part 1
Combustion engines are tried and true, and however angry they might look and sound in a top-fuel dragster or space rocket booster, the combustion process of oxidizing fuel in air is relatively slow and predictable. Detonation, on the other hand, is as chaotic and destructive as it sounds. It's how most bombs work; you take an explosive fuel and hit it with a jolt of energy, and the chemical bonds holding each molecule together break apart, releasing wild amounts of energy in a shockwave that expands at supersonic speed.
NASA, along with many other groups, wants to harness these explosions for a couple of key reasons. Firstly, detonation engines have a considerably higher theoretical level of efficiency than combustion engines, perhaps as much as 25%; they should be able to produce more thrust using less fuel and a smaller rocket. In the engineering and economics of space flight, that means cheaper launches, more billable payload, and greater distances.