>
BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Kyle Rittenhouse Warns The Left Is Preparing To Stage A False Flag To Blame...
The Biggest Grid We Escaped (It Wasn't Power)
Both Sides Gear Up For "War" As An Internal Revolution Begins To Erupt In The United State
The Good News Is People Are Realizing We're On Our Own
World's most powerful hypergravity machine is 1,900X stronger than Earth
New battery idea gets lots of power out of unusual sulfur chemistry
Anti-Aging Drug Regrows Knee Cartilage in Major Breakthrough That Could End Knee Replacements
Scientists say recent advances in Quantum Entanglement...
Solid-State Batteries Are In 'Trailblazer' Mode. What's Holding Them Up?
US Farmers Began Using Chemical Fertilizer After WW2. Comfrey Is a Natural Super Fertilizer
Kawasaki's four-legged robot-horse vehicle is going into production
The First Production All-Solid-State Battery Is Here, And It Promises 5-Minute Charging
See inside the tech-topia cities billionaires are betting big on developing...

Combustion engines are tried and true, and however angry they might look and sound in a top-fuel dragster or space rocket booster, the combustion process of oxidizing fuel in air is relatively slow and predictable. Detonation, on the other hand, is as chaotic and destructive as it sounds. It's how most bombs work; you take an explosive fuel and hit it with a jolt of energy, and the chemical bonds holding each molecule together break apart, releasing wild amounts of energy in a shockwave that expands at supersonic speed.
NASA, along with many other groups, wants to harness these explosions for a couple of key reasons. Firstly, detonation engines have a considerably higher theoretical level of efficiency than combustion engines, perhaps as much as 25%; they should be able to produce more thrust using less fuel and a smaller rocket. In the engineering and economics of space flight, that means cheaper launches, more billable payload, and greater distances.