>
Flock 'Safety'? That's Not What U.S. Patent Papers Say
Impeachment Looms Over Trump After the Pentagon's Leaked Nuclear Plans...
The Bunker State: The Government Will Survive, but Will the Constitution?
Singapore is experimenting with biological computing using living human neurons...
It's Happening - Europe is Building an Impossible Fusion Reactor
Portable 1MW Kaleidos Microreactor Secures Critical Nuclear Fuel Deal Through 2030s
This New All-In-One Range Extender Is Ready To Go Into Any Electric Truck
Aptera Reveals The Secret To Building Its Solar EV: China
High-voltage sodium home battery emerges as affordable rooftop solar solution
Peter Thiel-Funded Company Anduril to Triple the Number of Autonomous Surveillance...
China has released Origin Pilot, claimed to be the world's first open-source operating system...
ShieldAI XBAT Drone Fighters Can Give A Fighter Drone Wing to Every US Destroyer
Brain organoids, kept alive more than five years, matured like human brains

Combustion engines are tried and true, and however angry they might look and sound in a top-fuel dragster or space rocket booster, the combustion process of oxidizing fuel in air is relatively slow and predictable. Detonation, on the other hand, is as chaotic and destructive as it sounds. It's how most bombs work; you take an explosive fuel and hit it with a jolt of energy, and the chemical bonds holding each molecule together break apart, releasing wild amounts of energy in a shockwave that expands at supersonic speed.
NASA, along with many other groups, wants to harness these explosions for a couple of key reasons. Firstly, detonation engines have a considerably higher theoretical level of efficiency than combustion engines, perhaps as much as 25%; they should be able to produce more thrust using less fuel and a smaller rocket. In the engineering and economics of space flight, that means cheaper launches, more billable payload, and greater distances.