>
Hoover Dam is losing power. Inside the 'slowest-moving train wreck in history'
Black Privilege Called Out! – WNBA Incident Boils Over Into BIack Fatigue Across America
Pentagon Drafting New Nuclear Strategy To Expand Options for Tactical Nuclear Weapons Use
If They Were Human, They'd Be Arrested. Experts Respond To Rogue AI Breaches
Sodium Ion Batteries Will be 80% Cheaper & Last LONGER!
German startup SAXON Q has introduced a diamond-based quantum computing system...
Elon Musk To Build The Largest Building In The World - 100 Million Square Feet
Bitcoin 'Red Team' Says AI Is Finding 100s Of Critical Exploits Across Core Projects
EG4 Power Pro VS Ruixu Lithi VS Yixiang Budget Battery! Best Selling Battery Showdown!
Insect wings can kill bacteria without any chemicals!
5th Small Modular Reactor Validated Since June, Poised For Mass Production
Tesla Never Made An Electric Jet Boat, So This YouTuber Built One Himself
What could possibly go wrong? Scientists use AI to design new viruses

The slower mission times are for chemical rockets where we barely get out of Earth orbit with a small rocket engine. SpaceX Starship can refuel after reaching orbit to enable faster orbits (straighter and less looping paths) to go to Mars. This makes 90 day times each way easy with chemical Starship and even more wasteful but still chemical rockets to Mars in 45 days each way.
This is calculated by Ozan Bellik.
In 2033 there are opportunities to do a high thrust ~45 day outbound transit with a ~10.5km/s TMI (trans Mars injection). If you refill in an elliptical orbit that's at LEO+2.5-3km/s then the TMI burn requirement goes down to 7.5-8km/s. A SpaceX Starship with 1200 tons of fuel should be able to do with roughly 150 tons of burnout mass. This is enough for ship, residuals, and a crew cabin with enough consumables to last a moderately sized crew for the 45 day transit. The trouble is that once you get there, you are approaching Mars at ~15km/s.
One way to solve this would be to powerbrake to 8.5km/s and aerobrake from there. This needs an additional ~6.5km/s, and the most straightforward way to solve that is to send a fleet of expendable tankers alongside the crew ship and refill en route. This would call for 5 or more fully filled 2000 ton tankers in elliptical orbit. SpaceX could do it.
Alright, here we go.
— Ozan Bellik (@BellikOzan) November 28, 2023
In 2033 there are opportunities to do a high thrust ~45 day outbound transit with a ~10.5km/s TMI.
If you refill in an elliptical orbit that's at LEO+2.5-3km/s, your TMI burn requirement goes down to 7.5-8km/s, which a Starship w/ 1200t of prop should be… https://t.co/Rf2dDOOzwn