>
Trump Election Odds Near 67% As Polymarket Whale Bets Another $2M
JAYDEN DANIELS WITH A HAIL MARY TO BEAT THE BEARS AS TIME EXPIRES
Location of 'Noah's Ark' is revealed as scientists decipher world's oldest map on 3,
Dr. Charles Morgan on Psycho-Neurobiology and War
10-min super battery to power a new breed of long-range plug-in hybrid
Why is WiFi so Uniquely Harmful?
Tesla Already In Talks With Palo Alto To Deploy Robotaxis
New Lithium Manganese Iron Phosphate Batteries Scaling to Over 300 Gigawatt Hours...
Scientists found a way to make sound travel in only one direction
The U.S. Government Is Dramatically Expanding The Use Of Facial Recognition Technology
Watch: Hera asteroid defense mission lifts off
Buoyancy-driven hybrid energy platform moves to full-scale pilot
Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin Could Have a Commercial Space Station Running by 2030
Toyota Just Invested $500 Million in Electric Air-Taxi Maker Joby
Remember when we were subjected to a surreal barrage of orders from our governments to stay home, not entertain more than X guests for dinner, not open bars and restaurants to unvaccinated customers, stay away from places of worship, wear pieces of cloth on our faces while walking to our seats in bars, etc etc., purportedly with a view to crushing a respiratory virus that made a relatively marginal impact on average life expectancy?
And then we all took a big sigh of relief when governments finally lifted the restrictions? Well, don't get too comfortable, because the WHO, most likely with the complicity of your government, is pushing through a set of amendments to international pandemic laws that will put your livelihood and liberties at the mercy of a WHO-appointed "expert committee" whose advice during a pandemic or other "public health emergency" will supersede that of your own government.
The proposed amendments to International Health Regulations do not require any new treaty, even though the WHO is attempting to get a separate pandemic accord ratified in addition to the IHR amendments. These amendments alone will revolutionise the international legal framework that governs responses to public health emergencies. The amendments are still being negotiated and the WHO aims to see them finalised in May 2024. They will be considered fully ratified ten months later unless heads of State explicitly reject them in the meantime.
It is critical that heads of State explicitly reject these amendments before they come into effect, because they cede a dangerous amount of power to the WHO during international public health emergencies, and the WHO can activate this emergency power by unilaterally declaring a public health emergency "of international concern."