>
WHO Kills MAHA-Backed Hepatitis B Baby Vaccine Trial
Lula Leads After Last-Minute Voting Extension As "Bolsonaro Trade" Implodes
Grok Bot Tutorial: Beginner to Genius (Full Walkthrough)
Modular phone promises total privacy at the flick of a switch
Genetically Engineered War Dogs for 134 Pound Cyborg Dire Wolves Now – Later 600 Pound Wolves
They're Quietly REPLACING Our Food With THIS… And Nobody Is Talking About It!
Chicago Opens First "Teacher-Free" AI School as Global Push Accelerates
Solar Panels Are Doing Something Nobody Expected
DeLorean climbs skyward to race electric flying cars
Atari's 800XL returns with a keyboard, cartridges and BASIC
Bioinspired robot airdrops into remote waters via morphing wing-sail
Anduril interceptor adapts to emerging threats via swappable stages

Though it always seems to be 25 years away no matter what calendar you look at, the potential payoff of a practical fusion reactor is so earth-shattering that there is tremendous incentive to pursue the technology. The thing is, the problem isn't just creating a nuclear fusion reaction – any halfway decent physics lab can do that on a benchtop. The real trick is to build a commercial reactor that is net-energy positive and practical.
Aside from coming up with a reactor design that can steadily produce more energy than it consumes, fusion reactors must be able to turn that energy into power. They must also withstand the immense stresses produced by powerful magnetic fields, extreme heat, and the intense neutron radiation caused by the fusion process.