>
India's Israel arms ties enter a riskier new phase
Why Japan is leading the global bond selloff
Landmark study upends how we think the brain responds to psychedelics
Bowne Report: Tim Pool Israel's Fool
Brain organoids, kept alive more than five years, matured like human brains
Parkinson's patient's tremors VANISH within minutes of GROUNDBREAKING treatment
Polaris injects pneumatic shifting into expedition-grade side-by-side
NEW HOMES ARE BUILT WITH THIS AND IT'S MAKING YOU SICK
S3E33: I Beat the Attorney General. No Lawyers. My Legal Team Was AI
World's largest all-electric plane completes maiden flight
The Lucid Cosmos Will Have More Range Than Any Tesla
Strong 3D printable elastic polymer resists damage
Double hydrogen-combustion car breaks world land speed record
Vitalik Buterin Says Ethereum Is Betting Its Future On Quantum Security And AI

Though it always seems to be 25 years away no matter what calendar you look at, the potential payoff of a practical fusion reactor is so earth-shattering that there is tremendous incentive to pursue the technology. The thing is, the problem isn't just creating a nuclear fusion reaction – any halfway decent physics lab can do that on a benchtop. The real trick is to build a commercial reactor that is net-energy positive and practical.
Aside from coming up with a reactor design that can steadily produce more energy than it consumes, fusion reactors must be able to turn that energy into power. They must also withstand the immense stresses produced by powerful magnetic fields, extreme heat, and the intense neutron radiation caused by the fusion process.