The 357 Magnum and 44 Magnum are two of the most iconic rounds in American history.

Developed for similar reasons by the same individual, it's no wonder why these rounds have many similarities. But they aren't without important differences – foremost among them being their power.

Here's everything you need to know about the 44 Magnum and the 357 Magnum to choose the better cartridge for self-defense.

44 Magnum vs. 357 Magnum: How Different Are They?

The 44 Magnum, which is a wider, longer cartridge, is far more powerful – over twice as powerful than the 357 Magnum, depending on which two loads are being compared. Elmer Keith created the 357 Mag. He also played a crucial role during the development of the 44 Magnum, which he regarded as his greater success. Like his earlier creation, the 44 proved itself effective for hunting medium game with a revolver or lever-action rifle.

Before we continue, we must bring the 357 SIG to your attention.

The 357 SIG is not loaded with a true .357" bullet. It instead seats a .355" (9mm) bullet in a necked-down 10mm case (giving it the same bottleneck case common to so many rifle bullets). Despite sharing similar names, the 357 Mag and 357 SIG aren't interchangeable and must not be mistaken for one another. For a full breakdown of that pairing, see our 357 SIG vs. 357 Mag comparison.

Cartridge Specs

The parent case of the 357 Mag is the 38 Special. You can safely fire 38 Special ammo in a 357 Mag firearm for this reason. The opposite, however, isn't true. DO NOT attempt to fire 357 ammo in a 38 Special revolver.



The 44 Special is the parent case for the 44 Magnum. The same logic also applies to these rounds: weaker 44 Spl ammunition is safe for a larger 44 Mag revolver, but a smaller 44 Special revolver cannot handle more powerful 44 Mag ammo.

Both parent cases have head-to-head breakdowns of their own – see our 38 Special vs. 357 Magnum and 44 Special vs. 44 Magnum comparisons.

44 vs. 357 Recoil



Neither of these cartridges is known for its lack of recoil. When "Magnum" is the name, you can assume it'll treat you to a healthy kick (with some exceptions, foremost being the 22 Magnum, which isn't feisty).

Four factors determine how much recoil a cartridge generates on ignition: muzzle velocity, propellant weight, bullet weight, and firearm weight.

The 44 Magnum ammo often has higher muzzle velocity, more propellant, and a heavier bullet than 357 Mag. These factors grant the 44 Mag significantly stronger recoil, even though revolvers chambered for it are typically heavier.

The 44 Mag generates roughly 18.5 foot-pounds (ft-lbs) of recoil. The 357 Mag's average 11.5 ft-lbs of recoil isn't insubstantial (for context, the smaller 45 ACP has only around 4.5 ft-lbs of recoil). Even so, its recoil is dwarfed by that of the 44 Magnum – a cartridge with so much kick that most consider it impractical for defense against two-legged (i.e. non-ursine) threats.

Now we can see why these guns are often so much heavier than others. The added weight helps make handling them more manageable.

The winner of the recoil section is the 357 Mag. Its recoil isn't gentle by any means. The 44 Mag just happens to kick harder.

Trajectory

These wheel gun cartridges weren't designed for long-range shooting. Their trajectories past 50 yards are pretty unimpressive.

The 44 Mag's trajectory is slightly flatter: the natural product of its heavier, faster-flying bullet. But at the end of the day, the difference just isn't big enough to declare the larger round's trajectory "better."

357 Mag vs. 44 Mag Accuracy

The accuracy of a round depends on the bullet type, shooter, barrel length, and firearm.

For instance, my grandfather can outshoot me using his Ruger 357 Mag revolver. But when we switch to his 1911, I can outshoot him. Ultimately, no one round is more "accurate" than another. It depends on too many variables – including "Who's shooting the cartridge?" – to say so with any real certainty.

With that in mind, most people report greater accuracy out of the 357 Magnum. Why? Its lighter recoil, which accompanies less muzzle flip and prevents the shooter from flinching in anticipation of ignition: two reasons why it facilitates faster accurate follow-up shots.

357 vs. 44 Stopping Power



Ask anyone who carries a 357 or 44 Mag why they do it. Odds are their answer will include the phrase "stopping power."

If you ask them what this means, they won't give you a scientific definition. They'll probably answer something along the lines of "bigger cartridge equals bigger injury to threat; bigger injury threat equals better outcome for me."

But with today's ammunition technologies, bigger isn't always better. Smaller yet highly effective bullets for defense exist. Furthermore, shot placement counts for a lot. A good hit with a 22 LR will prove more effective than a miss with a 44 Mag.

A well-placed shot is not as easy to land when your life is on the line as it is at the range. That's why most people opt for the larger round: compensation for suboptimal shot placement.

The 44 Magnum and 357 Magnum were designed to hit much harder than their respective parent cartridges, which they do.

The 44 Magnum's larger bullet will punch a wider hole in its target. It will also hit it a lot harder. Sure, the 44 Mag carries a higher risk of over-penetration, which can endanger innocent bystanders, but it boasts substantially greater stopping power than its shorter, weaker competitor.

Hunting With the 44 Mag vs. 357 Mag

The 44 Magnum ammo was conceived as a hunting round. Since its introduction to the civilian market, it's exceeded those expectations.

The 44 Mag is the primary choice for big game hunters who use a revolver, as it can ethically take down any big game animal in North America. Many use a 44 Mag as a backup gun for self-defense against brown bears. It's also been known to take down elephants, water buffalo, and other African big game. In fewer words: It's a capable hunting cartridge.

But at the end of the day, the 44 Mag is still a handgun round. It's useless to the average shooter at ranges past 50 yards.

Although the 357 Magnum *could* ethically harvest any big game species in North America, it's vastly less preferred than the 44 Mag. There's a simple reason why. It's weaker! Sure, it has lower recoil, but all other things being equal, it's just not as versatile a solution to hunting as the 44 Mag.

See our 454 Casull vs. 44 Mag comparison for another big-bore revolver matchup.

357 Magnum vs. 44 Magnum for Self-Defense

The 357 Magnum was created long after its parent cartridge, the 38 Special, was determined to be too weak for combat. It was intended to give law enforcement officers an advantage over bootleggers – a type of crook that was often shielded by vehicle doors.

The 357 Mag proved itself an excellent self-defense round over the years. Countless people carry it for self-defense to this day.

The 44 Magnum was initially intended only for hunting; not as a tool for defense (against human threats, at least). Most would agree that the 44 Mag's ferocious recoil makes it too unreliable during a self-defense scenario. I, however, would argue that neither round is optimal for personal protection.

The first reason is over-penetration. Such powerful rounds' bullets are quite likely to pass clean through the threat. If innocent bystanders happen to be positioned directly behind the threat ... well, I don't care to say what could happen.

Another reason I don't recommend these cartridges for concealed carry is that they require larger firearms – and those are more difficult to conceal.

I also don't care for these rounds' high recoil, which leads to greater muzzle flip: i.e. the force that jerks sights off target on ignition, which complicates accurate, rapid fire. Throw in the fact that 357 and 44 Mag revolvers typically have a maximum capacity of six shots, and you can see why I'm even less enthused about carrying one for defense.

I'd recommend .45 ACP or 9mm over either the 357 or 44 for concealed carry. I recommend a 20 or 12 Gauge shotgun for home defense. While I'm at it.

This category is a tie.

See our 357 Magnum vs. 9mm comparison for a full head-to-head on the carry question.

357 Mag vs. 44 Mag Ammo Cost & Availability

Because both rounds are well established, major manufacturers such as Remington, Hornady, and Federal make both. Neither is cheap: about $1.40 per round at the time of writing.

Speaking of prices, check out our Remington 357 Magnum ammo and Fiocchi 357 Magnum ammo pages for additional ammo options!

These rounds sit in a middle ground when it comes to popularity. They're too niche for ammo manufacturers to justify producing them in 9mm quantities. At the same time, they're popular enough that many people want to buy them. Because of that, it can be difficult to find 357 or 44 at times.

This is another tie between the 44 and 357 Mag. Ammo cost and availability are virtually the same.

44 Magnum vs. 357 Magnum Gun Availability & Cost

Since the 357 Magnum has been around for over 80 years, many manufacturers like Ruger, Smith & Wesson, and Colt offer quality guns chambered for it. A reliable snub-nosed revolver will cost you about $1,000 (at the time of writing).

44 Magnum ammo firearms are just as abundant and similarly priced. A Ruger Redhawk chambered for either round costs around $1,400.

Henry, Marlin, Winchester, and Rossi all make lever guns chambered for 44 Mag and 357 Mag. Depending on the brand you purchase, be prepared to spend $500-$1,500.

Firearms chambered for either round are abundant. This category is therefore a tie.

Continue reading the full comparison here: https://ammo.com/comparison/357-vs-44