>
US-China race for orbital supremacy could decide a Taiwan war
Witkoff, Kushner set to visit Moscow and Kyiv, but US seeks security assurances before trip
The Praxian Genocidal Kill Chain -- Part 3
The Praxian Genocidal Kill Chain -- Part 2
Eating pollution? Plastic-to-cookie technology raises safety, environmental concerns
Ford's $30,000 Fathom EV Truck Appears More Conventional Than Expected
Berlin-based artist Simon Weckert explored that idea with Digital Camouflage...
Tether expands tokenization business into Saudi Arabia, starting with real estate
Ukraine is facing a new problem in its war with Russia:
It charges more than it discharges while driving
Dataminr AI tech to go live on NATO Maven system: CEO
The Most Dangerous Interview Ever Recorded? PART 2
2026 cars: George Orwell edition
Your government bought military-grade spyware and it can hear you breathing, watch your camera...

In Part 1, Iain Davis defined the Praxians, considered their openly stated control of the Trump administration, and examined their extensive partnerships with the Israeli defence technology sector. In Part 2, Davis considered global events through the lens of State Crimes Against Democracy (SCADs) and noted how civil-military fusion and hybrid war, combined with SCADs, are socially engineering a proposed new global "equilibrium." Here in Part 3, he delves into how global forces have aligned behind the Praxian vision of a Network Empire in the march toward a UN 2.0 Multipolar World Order.
The Praxians—a new breed of tech billionaires—form the core of the Silicon Valley-rooted wing of the global oligarchy. The Praxians are a subset of the network of tech moguls who are embedded within and encircle the Trump administration. The Praxians are distinguished by their close affiliation with the ideas of the Neoreactionary movement (NRx) and by their enthusiasm for building their own private city-states.
Some Praxians, such as Marc Andreessen, openly declare their adherence to NRx principles. Others, such as Mark Zuckerberg, extol NRx ideology through their corporate sloganeering. And still others, such as Peter Thiel, continuously fund specific NRx projects, such as Praxis in Greenland (see Part 1).
Ironically, there are aspects of the technology that the Praxians are encouraging us to adopt for their own ends that we could instead repurpose to finally free ourselves from their hierarchical authoritarianism. We could flip the features of programmable digital currency, such as central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) or stablecoins, and turn them from the ideal tool for centralised control into the means by which we achieve monetary and economic emancipation. And we could use some facets of the network state—the Praxians' own technology-based nation-building strategy—to construct new models of sovereign decentralised sociopolitical structures.
In my book, The Technocratic Dark State, I wrote:
Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT), such as blockchain, could be used to liberate instead of enslave us. Artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to improve our lives, not diminish them. Digital currencies, decentralized finance (DeFi), and financial technology (Fintech) could free up investment and lead to an explosion of economic, scientific, technological, and social innovation that benefits humanity, not just the oligarchy. [. . .] We could build homes, towns, and even cities that maximize our individual sovereignty and independence from authoritarian control.
It is a choice. It is our choice. Humanity, not oligarchy, is the dominant force on this planet. But if we don't get on with building the world we want, and if the oligarchs succeed in imposing the world they want, future generations will face a long and arduous struggle to once again free humanity from slavery.