>
Watch Live at 4:30 ET: Tina Peters' Appeal..
Losing Chickens? Tools Needed for Trapping Poultry Predators
Metals Tell the Truth About the Economy
RFK Jr. baffled over how Trump is alive with diet 'full of poison,'
Superheat Unveils the H1: A Revolutionary Bitcoin-Mining Water Heater at CES 2026
World's most powerful hypergravity machine is 1,900X stronger than Earth
New battery idea gets lots of power out of unusual sulfur chemistry
Anti-Aging Drug Regrows Knee Cartilage in Major Breakthrough That Could End Knee Replacements
Scientists say recent advances in Quantum Entanglement...
Solid-State Batteries Are In 'Trailblazer' Mode. What's Holding Them Up?
US Farmers Began Using Chemical Fertilizer After WW2. Comfrey Is a Natural Super Fertilizer
Kawasaki's four-legged robot-horse vehicle is going into production
The First Production All-Solid-State Battery Is Here, And It Promises 5-Minute Charging

You can watch the hearing live here (Rumble), here (YouTube) or on here (X).
Today at 4:30 p.m. ET in Colorado, former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters will have her appeal hearing to overturn her conviction on seven counts relating to her efforts to secure a forensic image of the Dominion Voting System software while it was under her custody prior to a "Trusted Build" performed by the Secretary of State of Colorado.
The Gateway Pundit covered her trial and has also covered the efforts to get the 70-year-old Gold Star mother out of prison since the trial.
President Trump has since pardoned Tina Peters; however, the convictions were at the state level, so there is controversy about whether or not the President has the authority to do so.
Jared Polis last week called Tina Peters' sentence "harsh" and said that he would look into possible actions to commute her sentence given her age and lack of criminal history or violence, according to the Denver Post.
Much scrutiny remains over the handling of her case by Judge Matthew Barrett regarding arguments that were forbidden to be made and evidence excluded from her trial. There was also scrutiny over whether or not exculpatory evidence was withheld from Tina Peters' defense and how that evidence might have affected how the investigation began.