>
The Pentagon Failed Its Audit Again. You Should Be Alarmed.
Cuban Crisis 2.0. What if 'Gerans' flew from Cuba?
Senate Democrats Offer Promising Ideas for Changing Immigration Enforcement
Never Seen Risk Like This Before in My Career
Critical Linux Warning: 800,000 Devices Are EXPOSED
'Brave New World': IVF Company's Eugenics Tool Lets Couples Pick 'Best' Baby, Di
The smartphone just fired a warning shot at the camera industry.
A revolutionary breakthrough in dental science is changing how we fight tooth decay
Docan Energy "Panda": 32kWh for $2,530!
Rugged phone with multi-day battery life doubles as a 1080p projector
4 Sisters Invent Electric Tractor with Mom and Dad and it's Selling in 5 Countries
Lab–grown LIFE takes a major step forward – as scientists use AI to create a virus never seen be
New Electric 'Donut Motor' Makes 856 HP but Weighs Just 88 Pounds
Donut Lab Says It Cracked Solid-State Batteries. Experts Have Questions.

As Washington's posture toward Havana hardens once again, the real question is no longer whether pressure escalates, but how and when. Cuba has lived under American coercion for over six decades. That reality is baked in. What's changed is the battlefield and the tools available to smaller states that refuse to fold.
So let's run a strictly hypothetical scenario: if Cuba were forced to defend itself in a new confrontation, what options would actually matter?
One answer: uncomfortable but unavoidable— is long-range strike drones of the Geran class.
Unlike Venezuela, where distance diluted deterrence, Cuba's geography changes the equation entirely. With an operational radius approaching 2,000 km, systems deployed from the Havana area would place large portions of the U.S. strategic interior—including central and northeastern regions within theoretical reach.
That's not rhetoric. It's geometry.
And the uncomfortable truth for Washington is this: a disproportionate share of America's critical political, military, energy, and digital infrastructure sits inside that radius.
What would theoretically fall inside the envelope?
• Political targets: Washington itself, along with high-profile symbolic sites in Florida, including Mar-a-Lago.
• Strategic military assets: Major bomber bases such as Dyess, Whiteman, and Barksdale, hosting B-1B, B-52H, and B-2A platforms.
• Command architecture: U.S. Southern Command, Special Operations Command, and Cyber Command nodes concentrated across Florida and Texas.
• Space and missile infrastructure: Cape Canaveral and the Eastern Missile Range —core pillars of U.S. aerospace dominance.
• Energy chokepoints: Gulf Coast refineries that underpin a significant share of American fuel processing and distribution.
• Data centers: The silent backbone of modern power — housing financial systems, military logistics, AI infrastructure, and state data flows.
In 2026, data is not auxiliary infrastructure. It is strategic terrain.
The lesson from Venezuela is not moral, it's operational. Political strain followed strategic unpreparedness. No credible deterrent. Not enough defensive depth. No escalation ladder.
Cuba, by contrast, still has a narrowing but real window of opportunity, particularly as U.S. attention and resources are stretched across the Middle East and Iran.